mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithmic Thresholds for Refuting Random Polynomial Systems

arXiv 2110.08677 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2021cs.CC cs.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Consider a system of m polynomial equations pi(x) = bii ≤ m of degree D≥ 2 in n-dimensional variable x ∈ ℝn such that each coefficient of every pi and bis are chosen at random and independently from some continuous distribution. We study the basic question of determining the smallest m -- the algorithmic threshold -- for which efficient algorithms can find refutations (i.e. certificates of unsatisfiability) for such systems. This setting generalizes problems such as refuting random SAT instances, low-rank matrix sensing and certifying pseudo-randomness of Goldreich's candidate generators and generalizations. We show that for every d ∈ mathbbN, the (n+m)O(d)-time canonical sum-of-squares (SoS) relaxation refutes such a system with high probability whenever m ≥ O(n) · (fracnd)D-1. We prove a lower bound in the restricted low-degree polynomial model of computation which suggests that this trade-off between SoS degree and the number of equations is nearly tight for all d. We also confirm the predictions of this lower bound in a limited setting by showing a lower bound on the canonical degree-4 sum-of-squares relaxation for refuting random quadratic polynomials. Together, our results provide evidence for an algorithmic threshold for the problem at m gtrsim widetildeO(n) · n(1-δ)(D-1) for 2^nδ-time algorithms for all δ.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.