mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

C-AllOut: Catching & Calling Outliers by Type

arXiv 2110.08257 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given an unlabeled dataset, wherein we have access only to pairwise similarities (or distances), how can we effectively (1) detect outliers, and (2) annotate/tag the outliers by type? Outlier detection has a large literature, yet we find a key gap in the field: to our knowledge, no existing work addresses the outlier annotation problem. Outliers are broadly classified into 3 types, representing distinct patterns that could be valuable to analysts: (a) global outliers are severe yet isolate cases that do not repeat, e.g., a data collection error; (b) local outliers diverge from their peers within a context, e.g., a particularly short basketball player; and (c) collective outliers are isolated micro-clusters that may indicate coalition or repetitions, e.g., frauds that exploit the same loophole. This paper presents C-AllOut: a novel and effective outlier detector that annotates outliers by type. It is parameter-free and scalable, besides working only with pairwise similarities (or distances) when it is needed. We show that C-AllOut achieves on par or significantly better performance than state-of-the-art detectors when spotting outliers regardless of their type. It is also highly effective in annotating outliers of particular types, a task that none of the baselines can perform.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.

Builds on

2 of 22 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Detection with Realistic Synthetic Datacited by 25
  2. 2016Robust Contextual Outlier Detection: Where Context Meets Sparsitycited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.