Modeling Proficiency with Implicit User Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce the problem of proficiency modeling: Given a user's posts on a social media platform, the task is to identify the subset of posts or topics for which the user has some level of proficiency. This enables the filtering and ranking of social media posts on a given topic as per user proficiency. Unlike experts on a given topic, proficient users may not have received formal training and possess years of practical experience, but may be autodidacts, hobbyists, and people with sustained interest, enabling them to make genuine and original contributions to discourse. While predicting whether a user is an expert on a given topic imposes strong constraints on who is a true positive, proficiency modeling implies a graded scoring, relaxing these constraints. Put another way, many active social media users can be assumed to possess, or eventually acquire, some level of proficiency on topics relevant to their community. We tackle proficiency modeling in an unsupervised manner by utilizing user embeddings to model engagement with a given topic, as indicated by a user's preference for authoring related content. We investigate five alternative approaches to model proficiency, ranging from basic ones to an advanced, tailored user modeling approach, applied within two real-world benchmarks for evaluation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2021.
Builds on
5 of 36 references.
References · 5
- 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
- 2016Modelling Context with User Embeddings for Sarcasm Detection in Social Mediacited by 26
- 2017Quantifying Mental Health from Social Media with Neural User Embeddingscited by 13
- 2021Exploring Self-Identified Counseling Expertise in Online Support Forumscited by 10
- 2016Unsupervised, Efficient and Semantic Expertise Retrievalcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.