Compliance checking in reified IO logic via SHACL
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reified Input/Output (I/O) logic[21] has been recently proposed to model real-world norms in terms of the logic in [11]. This is massively grounded on the notion of reification, and it has specifically designed to model meaning of natural language sentences, such as the ones occurring in existing legislation. This paper presents a methodology to carry out compliance checking on reified I/O logic formulae. These are translated in SHACL (Shapes Constraint Language) shapes, a recent W3C recommendation to validate and reason with RDF triplestores. Compliance checking is then enforced by validating RDF graphs describing states of affairs with respect to these SHACL shapes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.
Builds on
2 of 31 references.
References · 2
- 2017Enabling Reasoning with LegalRuleMLcited by 8
- 2020Real Time Reasoning in OWL2 for GDPR Compliancecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.