mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Identification of Metallic Objects using Spectral Magnetic Polarizability Tensor Signatures: Object Classification

arXiv 2110.06624 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The early detection of terrorist threat objects, such as guns and knives, through improved metal detection, has the potential to reduce the number of attacks and improve public safety and security. To achieve this, there is considerable potential to use the fields applied and measured by a metal detector to discriminate between different shapes and different metals since, hidden within the field perturbation, is object characterisation information. The magnetic polarizability tensor (MPT) offers an economical characterisation of metallic objects and its spectral signature provides additional object characterisation information. The MPT spectral signature can be determined from measurements of the induced voltage over a range frequencies in a metal signature for a hidden object. With classification in mind, it can also be computed in advance for different threat and non-threat objects. In the article, we evaluate the performance of probabilistic and non-probabilistic machine learning algorithms, trained using a dictionary of computed MPT spectral signatures, to classify objects for metal detection. We discuss the importances of using appropriate features and selecting an appropriate algorithm depending on the classification problem being solved and we present numerical results for a range of practically motivated metal detection classification problems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.

Builds on

3 of 50 references.

References · 3

  1. 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 467
  2. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 422
  3. 2015What the F-measure doesn't measure: Features, Flaws, Fallacies and Fixescited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.