Clustering-Based Interpretation of Deep ReLU Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Amongst others, the adoption of Rectified Linear Units (ReLUs) is regarded as one of the ingredients of the success of deep learning. ReLU activation has been shown to mitigate the vanishing gradient issue, to encourage sparsity in the learned parameters, and to allow for efficient backpropagation. In this paper, we recognize that the non-linear behavior of the ReLU function gives rise to a natural clustering when the pattern of active neurons is considered. This observation helps to deepen the learning mechanism of the network; in fact, we demonstrate that, within each cluster, the network can be fully represented as an affine map. The consequence is that we are able to recover an explanation, in the form of feature importance, for the predictions done by the network to the instances belonging to the cluster. Therefore, the methodology we propose is able to increase the level of interpretability of a fully connected feedforward ReLU neural network, downstream from the fitting phase of the model, without altering the structure of the network. A simulation study and the empirical application to the Titanic dataset, show the capability of the method to bridge the gap between the algorithm optimization and the human understandability of the black box deep ReLU networks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.
Builds on
10 of 16 references.
References · 10
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
- 2016Gradients of Counterfactualscited by 31
- 2015Expressiveness of Rectifier Networkscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.