mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learnability of the output distributions of local quantum circuits

arXiv 2110.05517 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2021quant-ph cs.CC cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is currently a large interest in understanding the potential advantages quantum devices can offer for probabilistic modelling. In this work we investigate, within two different oracle models, the probably approximately correct (PAC) learnability of quantum circuit Born machines, i.e., the output distributions of local quantum circuits. We first show a negative result, namely, that the output distributions of super-logarithmic depth Clifford circuits are not sample-efficiently learnable in the statistical query model, i.e., when given query access to empirical expectation values of bounded functions over the sample space. This immediately implies the hardness, for both quantum and classical algorithms, of learning from statistical queries the output distributions of local quantum circuits using any gate set which includes the Clifford group. As many practical generative modelling algorithms use statistical queries -- including those for training quantum circuit Born machines -- our result is broadly applicable and strongly limits the possibility of a meaningful quantum advantage for learning the output distributions of local quantum circuits. As a positive result, we show that in a more powerful oracle model, namely when directly given access to samples, the output distributions of local Clifford circuits are computationally efficiently PAC learnable by a classical learner. Our results are equally applicable to the problems of learning an algorithm for generating samples from the target distribution (generative modelling) and learning an algorithm for evaluating its probabilities (density modelling). They provide the first rigorous insights into the learnability of output distributions of local quantum circuits from the probabilistic modelling perspective.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.

Builds on

17 of 69 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 692
  2. 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 332
  3. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 271
  4. 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 233
  5. 2018Quantum generative adversarial networkscited by 128
  6. 2016Learning in Implicit Generative Modelscited by 125
  7. 2016Statistical Query Lower Bounds for Robust Estimation of High-dimensional Gaussians and Gaussian Mixturescited by 115
  8. 2021Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithmscited by 79
  9. 2019The Born Supremacy: Quantum Advantage and Training of an Ising Born Machinecited by 76
  10. 2020On the Quantum versus Classical Learnability of Discrete Distributionscited by 57
  11. 2019Expressive power of tensor-network factorizations for probabilistic modeling, with applications from hidden Markov models to quantum machine learningcited by 55
  12. 2019Quantum Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 33
5 more
  1. 2016A General Characterization of the Statistical Query Complexitycited by 27
  2. 2019Quantum Hamiltonian-Based Models and the Variational Quantum Thermalizer Algorithmcited by 27
  3. 2017Stabiliser states are efficiently PAC-learnablecited by 8
  4. 2021On the Hardness of PAC-learning Stabilizer States with Noisecited by 8
  5. 2020Learnability and Complexity of Quantum Samplescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

7 papers.