mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Density-based interpretable hypercube region partitioning for mixed numeric and categorical data

arXiv 2110.05430 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2021cs.LG stat.APcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Consider a structured dataset of features, such as textrmSEX, textrmINCOME, textrmRACE, textrmEXPERIENCE. A user may want to know where in the feature space observations are concentrated, and where it is sparse or empty. The existence of large sparse or empty regions can provide domain knowledge of soft or hard feature constraints (e.g., what is the typical income range, or that it may be unlikely to have a high income with few years of work experience). Also, these can suggest to the user that machine learning (ML) model predictions for data inputs in sparse or empty regions may be unreliable. An interpretable region is a hyper-rectangle, such as textrmRACE ∈textrmBlack, textrmWhite:& 10 ≤ :textrmEXPERIENCE :≤ 13, containing all observations satisfying the constraints; typically, such regions are defined by a small number of features. Our method constructs an observation density-based partition of the observed feature space in the dataset into such regions. It has a number of advantages over others in that it works on features of mixed type (numeric or categorical) in the original domain, and can separate out empty regions as well. As can be seen from visualizations, the resulting partitions accord with spatial groupings that a human eye might identify; the results should thus extend to higher dimensions. We also show some applications of the partition to other data analysis tasks, such as inferring about ML model error, measuring high-dimensional density variability, and causal inference for treatment effect. Many of these applications are made possible by the hyper-rectangular form of the partition regions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.

Builds on

3 of 24 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019An Evaluation Toolkit to Guide Model Selection and Cohort Definition in Causal Inferencecited by 18
  2. 2021FreaAI: Automated extraction of data slices to test machine learning modelscited by 10
  3. 2019Distance approximation using Isolation Forestscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.