Multi-institutional Validation of Two-Streamed Deep Learning Method for Automated Delineation of Esophageal Gross Tumor Volume using planning-CT and FDG-PETCT
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: The current clinical workflow for esophageal gross tumor volume (GTV) contouring relies on manual delineation of high labor-costs and interuser variability. Purpose: To validate the clinical applicability of a deep learning (DL) multi-modality esophageal GTV contouring model, developed at 1 institution whereas tested at multiple ones. Methods and Materials: We collected 606 esophageal cancer patients from four institutions. 252 institution-1 patients had a treatment planning-CT (pCT) and a pair of diagnostic FDG-PETCT; 354 patients from other 3 institutions had only pCT. A two-streamed DL model for GTV segmentation was developed using pCT and PETCT scans of a 148 patient institution-1 subset. This built model had the flexibility of segmenting GTVs via only pCT or pCT+PETCT combined. For independent evaluation, the rest 104 institution-1 patients behaved as unseen internal testing, and 354 institutions 2-4 patients were used for external testing. We evaluated manual revision degrees by human experts to assess the contour-editing effort. The performance of the deep model was compared against 4 radiation oncologists in a multiuser study with 20 random external patients. Contouring accuracy and time were recorded for the pre-and post-DL assisted delineation process. Results: Our model achieved high segmentation accuracy in internal testing (mean Dice score: 0.81 using pCT and 0.83 using pCT+PET) and generalized well to external evaluation (mean DSC: 0.80). Expert assessment showed that the predicted contours of 88% patients need only minor or no revision. In multi-user evaluation, with the assistance of a deep model, inter-observer variation and required contouring time were reduced by 37.6% and 48.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Deep learning predicted GTV contours were in close agreement with the ground truth and could be adopted clinically with mostly minor or no changes.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.
Builds on
13 of 42 references.
References · 13
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
- 2014Deeply-Supervised Netscited by 364
- 2018Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapycited by 76
- 2014A New 2.5D Representation for Lymph Node Detection using Random Sets of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Observationscited by 56
- 2018CT-Realistic Lung Nodule Simulation from 3D Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks for Robust Lung Segmentationcited by 34
- 2020Organ at Risk Segmentation for Head and Neck Cancer using Stratified Learning and Neural Architecture Searchcited by 23
- 2020Lymph Node Gross Tumor Volume Detection and Segmentation via Distance-based Gating using 3D CT/PET Imaging in Radiotherapycited by 15
- 2020Lymph Node Gross Tumor Volume Detection in Oncology Imaging via Relationship Learning Using Graph Neural Networkcited by 12
- 2017Progressive and Multi-Path Holistically Nested Neural Networks for Pathological Lung Segmentation from CT Imagescited by 11
- 2021DeepStationing: Thoracic Lymph Node Station Parsing in CT Scans using Anatomical Context Encoding and Key Organ Auto-Searchcited by 9
- 2019Accurate Esophageal Gross Tumor Volume Segmentation in PET/CT using Two-Stream Chained 3D Deep Network Fusioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.