Ethical Assurance: A practical approach to the responsible design, development, and deployment of data-driven technologies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This article offers several contributions to the interdisciplinary project of responsible research and innovation in data science and AI. First, it provides a critical analysis of current efforts to establish practical mechanisms for algorithmic assessment, which are used to operationalise normative principles, such as sustainability, accountability, transparency, fairness, and explainability, in order to identify limitations and gaps with the current approaches. Second, it provides an accessible introduction to the methodology of argument-based assurance, and explores how it is currently being applied in the development of safety cases for autonomous and intelligent systems. Third, it generalises this method to incorporate wider ethical, social, and legal considerations, in turn establishing a novel version of argument-based assurance that we call 'ethical assurance'. Ethical assurance is presented as a structured means for unifying the myriad practical mechanisms that have been proposed, as it is built upon a process-based form of project governance that supports inclusive and participatory ethical deliberation while also remaining grounded in social and technical realities. Finally, it sets an agenda for ethical assurance, by detailing current challenges, open questions, and next steps, which serve as a springboard to build an active (and interdisciplinary) research programme as well as contribute to ongoing discussions in policy and governance.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2022A Principles-based Ethics Assurance Argument Pattern for AI and Autonomous Systemscited by 6
- 2022Artificial intelligence in government: Concepts, standards, and a unified frameworkcited by 3
- 2023The Ethics of AI Value Chainscited by 3
- 2024Surveying Attitudinal Alignment Between Large Language Models Vs. Humans Towards 17 Sustainable Development Goalscited by 3
- 2022Data Justice in Practice: A Guide for Developerscited by 2
- 2025Justified Evidence Collection for Argument-based AI Fairness Assurancecited by 2
- 2023A multidomain relational framework to guide institutional AI research and adoptioncited by 1
- 2026Clear, Compelling Arguments: Rethinking the Foundations of Frontier AI Safety Casescited by 1
- 2026I'm Sorry Driver, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That: Appraising the Safety of LLMs within Automotive Contextscited by 0
- 2026I'm Sorry Driver, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That: Appraising the Safety of LLMs within Automotive Contexts12 Jun 2026
- 2026Clear, Compelling Arguments: Rethinking the Foundations of Frontier AI Safety Cases8 Mar 2026
- 2025Justified Evidence Collection for Argument-based AI Fairness Assurance12 May 2025
- 2024Surveying Attitudinal Alignment Between Large Language Models Vs. Humans Towards 17 Sustainable Development Goals22 Apr 2024
- 2023The Ethics of AI Value Chains31 Jul 2023
- 2023A multidomain relational framework to guide institutional AI research and adoption17 Mar 2023
- 2022Artificial intelligence in government: Concepts, standards, and a unified framework31 Oct 2022
- 2022Data Justice in Practice: A Guide for Developers12 Apr 2022
- 2022A Principles-based Ethics Assurance Argument Pattern for AI and Autonomous Systems29 Mar 2022