mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Disturbing Target Values for Neural Network Regularization

arXiv 2110.05003 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2021cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Diverse regularization techniques have been developed such as L2 regularization, Dropout, DisturbLabel (DL) to prevent overfitting. DL, a newcomer on the scene, regularizes the loss layer by flipping a small share of the target labels at random and training the neural network on this distorted data so as to not learn the training data. It is observed that high confidence labels during training cause the overfitting problem and DL selects disturb labels at random regardless of the confidence of labels. To solve this shortcoming of DL, we propose Directional DisturbLabel (DDL) a novel regularization technique that makes use of the class probabilities to infer the confident labels and using these labels to regularize the model. This active regularization makes use of the model behavior during training to regularize it in a more directed manner. To address regression problems, we also propose DisturbValue (DV), and DisturbError (DE). DE uses only predefined confident labels to disturb target values. DV injects noise into a portion of target values at random similar to DL. In this paper, 6 and 8 datasets are used to validate the robustness of our methods in classification and regression tasks respectively. Finally, we demonstrate that our methods are either comparable to or outperform DisturbLabel, L2 regularization, and Dropout. Also, we achieve the best performance in more than half the datasets by combining our methods with either L2 regularization or Dropout.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.

Builds on

13 of 36 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  5. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  6. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  7. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  8. 2018Improving Regression Performance with Distributional Lossescited by 67
  9. 2016DisturbLabel: Regularizing CNN on the Loss Layercited by 41
  10. 2020Being Bayesian about Categorical Probabilitycited by 35
  11. 2020Regularization via Structural Label Smoothingcited by 29
  12. 2014Analyzing noise in autoencoders and deep networkscited by 25
1 more
  1. 2020Deep Neural Network Perception Models and Robust Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.