mlsanityData to 19 Oct 2026

Estimating the confidence of speech spoofing countermeasure

arXiv 2110.04775 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2021eess.AS cs.CR cs.SDcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conventional speech spoofing countermeasures (CMs) are designed to make a binary decision on an input trial. However, a CM trained on a closed-set database is theoretically not guaranteed to perform well on unknown spoofing attacks. In some scenarios, an alternative strategy is to let the CM defer a decision when it is not confident. The question is then how to estimate a CM's confidence regarding an input trial. We investigated a few confidence estimators that can be easily plugged into a CM. On the ASVspoof2019 logical access database, the results demonstrate that an energy-based estimator and a neural-network-based one achieved acceptable performance in identifying unknown attacks in the test set. On a test set with additional unknown attacks and bona fide trials from other databases, the confidence estimators performed moderately well, and the CMs better discriminated bona fide and spoofed trials that had a high confidence score. Additional results also revealed the difficulty in enhancing a confidence estimator by adding unknown attacks to the training set.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 19 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.