Google Landmark Retrieval 2021 Competition Third Place Solution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present our solutions to the Google Landmark Challenges 2021, for both the retrieval and the recognition tracks. Both solutions are ensembles of transformers and ConvNet models based on Sub-center ArcFace with dynamic margins. Since the two tracks share the same training data, we used the same pipeline and training approach, but with different model selections for the ensemble and different post-processing. The key improvement over last year is newer state-of-the-art vision architectures, especially transformers which significantly outperform ConvNets for the retrieval task. We finished third and fourth places for the retrieval and recognition tracks respectively.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2021.
Builds on
12 of 17 references.
References · 12
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 309
- 2019Large-scale Landmark Retrieval/Recognition under a Noisy and Diverse Datasetcited by 17
- 2020Supporting large-scale image recognition with out-of-domain samplescited by 9
- 2020Google Landmark Recognition 2020 Competition Third Place Solutioncited by 9
- 2021Towards A Fairer Landmark Recognition Datasetcited by 9
- 20201st Place Solution to Google Landmark Retrieval 2020cited by 6
- 2021Efficient large-scale image retrieval with deep feature orthogonality and Hybrid-Swin-Transformerscited by 3
- 2019Team JL Solution to Google Landmark Recognition 2019cited by 2
- 20212nd Place Solution to Google Landmark Recognition Competition 2021cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.