mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scaling Bayesian Optimization With Game Theory

arXiv 2110.03790 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the algorithm Bayesian Optimization (BO) with Fictitious Play (BOFiP) for the optimization of high dimensional black box functions. BOFiP decomposes the original, high dimensional, space into several sub-spaces defined by non-overlapping sets of dimensions. These sets are randomly generated at the start of the algorithm, and they form a partition of the dimensions of the original space. BOFiP searches the original space with alternating BO, within sub-spaces, and information exchange among sub-spaces, to update the sub-space function evaluation. The basic idea is to distribute the high dimensional optimization across low dimensional sub-spaces, where each sub-space is a player in an equal interest game. At each iteration, BO produces approximate best replies that update the players belief distribution. The belief update and BO alternate until a stopping condition is met. High dimensional problems are common in real applications, and several contributions in the BO literature have highlighted the difficulty in scaling to high dimensions due to the computational complexity associated to the estimation of the model hyperparameters. Such complexity is exponential in the problem dimension, resulting in substantial loss of performance for most techniques with the increase of the input dimensionality. We compare BOFiP to several state-of-the-art approaches in the field of high dimensional black box optimization. The numerical experiments show the performance over three benchmark objective functions from 20 up to 1000 dimensions. A neural network architecture design problem is tested with 42 up to 911 nodes in 6 up to 92 layers, respectively, resulting into networks with 500 up to 10,000 weights. These sets of experiments empirically show that BOFiP outperforms its competitors, showing consistent performance across different problems and increasing problem dimensionality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2021.

Builds on

17 of 75 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
  2. 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 383
  3. 2013Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddingscited by 182
  4. 2015High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation and Bandits via Additive Modelscited by 139
  5. 2017Batched Large-scale Bayesian Optimization in High-dimensional Spacescited by 117
  6. 2015Less is More: Nystr"om Computational Regularizationcited by 91
  7. 2018BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernelscited by 65
  8. 2018High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Additive Models with Overlapping Groupscited by 59
  9. 2017Batched High-dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Structural Kernel Learningcited by 51
  10. 2016Practical heteroskedastic Gaussian process modeling for large simulation experimentscited by 39
  11. 2016Batched Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization via Determinantal Point Processescited by 33
  12. 2017On the choice of the low-dimensional domain for global optimization via random embeddingscited by 25
5 more
  1. 2017Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applicationscited by 23
  2. 2014A warped kernel improving robustness in Bayesian optimization via random embeddingscited by 17
  3. 2020Explicit Gradient Learningcited by 5
  4. 2017Regular Potential Gamescited by 2
  5. 2017On the Exponential Rate of Convergence of Fictitious Play in Potential Gamescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.