Explanation as a process: user-centric construction of multi-level and multi-modal explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the last years, XAI research has mainly been concerned with developing new technical approaches to explain deep learning models. Just recent research has started to acknowledge the need to tailor explanations to different contexts and requirements of stakeholders. Explanations must not only suit developers of models, but also domain experts as well as end users. Thus, in order to satisfy different stakeholders, explanation methods need to be combined. While multi-modal explanations have been used to make model predictions more transparent, less research has focused on treating explanation as a process, where users can ask for information according to the level of understanding gained at a certain point in time. Consequently, an opportunity to explore explanations on different levels of abstraction should be provided besides multi-modal explanations. We present a process-based approach that combines multi-level and multi-modal explanations. The user can ask for textual explanations or visualizations through conversational interaction in a drill-down manner. We use Inductive Logic Programming, an interpretable machine learning approach, to learn a comprehensible model. Further, we present an algorithm that creates an explanatory tree for each example for which a classifier decision is to be explained. The explanatory tree can be navigated by the user to get answers of different levels of detail. We provide a proof-of-concept implementation for concepts induced from a semantic net about living beings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2021.
Builds on
7 of 40 references.
References · 7
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
- 2018Grounding Visual Explanationscited by 93
- 2020The Pragmatic Turn in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)cited by 54
- 2020The Grammar of Interactive Explanatory Model Analysiscited by 24
- 2020Should We Trust (X)AI? Design Dimensions for Structured Experimental Evaluationscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022Leveraging Explanations in Interactive Machine Learning: An Overviewcited by 53
- 2023Mind the Gap! Bridging Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Understanding with Luhmann's Functional Theory of Communicationcited by 9
- 2023Explaining Hate Speech Classification with Model Agnostic Methodscited by 1
- 2022CorrLoss: Integrating Co-Occurrence Domain Knowledge for Affect Recognitioncited by 0
- 2023Explaining Hate Speech Classification with Model Agnostic Methods30 May 2023
- 2023Mind the Gap! Bridging Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Understanding with Luhmann's Functional Theory of Communication7 Feb 2023
- 2022CorrLoss: Integrating Co-Occurrence Domain Knowledge for Affect Recognition31 Oct 2022
- 2022Leveraging Explanations in Interactive Machine Learning: An Overview29 Jul 2022