SWAT Watershed Model Calibration using Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Watershed models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) consist of high-dimensional physical and empirical parameters. These parameters need to be accurately calibrated for models to produce reliable predictions for streamflow, evapotranspiration, snow water equivalent, and nutrient loading. Existing parameter estimation methods are time-consuming, inefficient, and computationally intensive, with reduced accuracy when estimating high-dimensional parameters. In this paper, we present a fast, accurate, and reliable methodology to calibrate the SWAT model (i.e., 21 parameters) using deep learning (DL). We develop DL-enabled inverse models based on convolutional neural networks to ingest streamflow data and estimate the SWAT model parameters. Hyperparameter tuning is performed to identify the optimal neural network architecture and the nine next best candidates. We use ensemble SWAT simulations to train, validate, and test the above DL models. We estimated the actual parameters of the SWAT model using observational data. We test and validate the proposed DL methodology on the American River Watershed, located in the Pacific Northwest-based Yakima River basin. Our results show that the DL models-based calibration is better than traditional parameter estimation methods, such as generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE). The behavioral parameter sets estimated by DL have narrower ranges than GLUE and produce values within the sampling range even under high relative observational errors. This narrow range of parameters shows the reliability of the proposed workflow to estimate sensitive parameters accurately even under noise. Due to its fast and reasonably accurate estimations of process parameters, the proposed DL workflow is attractive for calibrating integrated hydrologic models for large spatial-scale applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2021.
Builds on
14 of 103 references.
References · 14
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
- 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 770
- 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
- 2018Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlowcited by 279
- 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 165
- 2020Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Scientific Discovery: An Application in Simulating Lake Temperature Profilescited by 59
- 2017A trans-disciplinary review of deep learning research for water resources scientistscited by 47
- 2020A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning Applications in Hydrology and Water Resourcescited by 30
- 2020Parameter Estimation with Dense and Convolutional Neural Networks Applied to the FitzHugh-Nagumo ODEcited by 19
- 2020Physics Guided Machine Learning Methods for Hydrologycited by 17
- 2020Predicting Water Temperature Dynamics of Unmonitored Lakes with Meta Transfer Learningcited by 15
- 2021Enhancing predictive skills in physically-consistent way: Physics Informed Machine Learning for Hydrological Processescited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.