mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distribution Mismatch Correction for Improved Robustness in Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2110.01955 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks rely heavily on normalization methods to improve their performance and learning behavior. Although normalization methods spurred the development of increasingly deep and efficient architectures, they also increase the vulnerability with respect to noise and input corruptions. In most applications, however, noise is ubiquitous and diverse; this can often lead to complete failure of machine learning systems as they fail to cope with mismatches between the input distribution during training- and test-time. The most common normalization method, batch normalization, reduces the distribution shift during training but is agnostic to changes in the input distribution during test time. This makes batch normalization prone to performance degradation whenever noise is present during test-time. Sample-based normalization methods can correct linear transformations of the activation distribution but cannot mitigate changes in the distribution shape; this makes the network vulnerable to distribution changes that cannot be reflected in the normalization parameters. We propose an unsupervised non-parametric distribution correction method that adapts the activation distribution of each layer. This reduces the mismatch between the training and test-time distribution by minimizing the 1-D Wasserstein distance. In our experiments, we empirically show that the proposed method effectively reduces the impact of intense image corruptions and thus improves the classification performance without the need for retraining or fine-tuning the model.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2021.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  7. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
  8. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  9. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  10. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  11. 2013Fast Computation of Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 216
  12. 2019Mish: A Self Regularized Non-Monotonic Activation Functioncited by 141
7 more
  1. 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 137
  2. 2018Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learningcited by 130
  3. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
  4. 2020Revisiting Batch Normalization for Improving Corruption Robustnesscited by 55
  5. 2019Filter Response Normalization Layer: Eliminating Batch Dependence in the Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 45
  6. 2019Capsule Routing via Variational Bayescited by 32
  7. 2015Discrete Wasserstein Barycenters: Optimal Transport for Discrete Datacited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.