3LegRace: Privacy-Preserving DNN Training over TEEs and GPUs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Leveraging parallel hardware (e.g. GPUs) for deep neural network (DNN) training brings high computing performance. However, it raises data privacy concerns as GPUs lack a trusted environment to protect the data. Trusted execution environments (TEEs) have emerged as a promising solution to achieve privacy-preserving learning. Unfortunately, TEEs' limited computing power renders them not comparable to GPUs in performance. To improve the trade-off among privacy, computing performance, and model accuracy, we propose an asymmetric model decomposition framework, AsymML, to (1) accelerate training using parallel hardware; and (2) achieve a strong privacy guarantee using TEEs and differential privacy (DP) with much less accuracy compromised compared to DP-only methods. By exploiting the low-rank characteristics in training data and intermediate features, AsymML asymmetrically decomposes inputs and intermediate activations into low-rank and residual parts. With the decomposed data, the target DNN model is accordingly split into a trusted and an untrusted part. The trusted part performs computations on low-rank data, with low compute and memory costs. The untrusted part is fed with residuals perturbed by very small noise. Privacy, computing performance, and model accuracy are well managed by respectively delegating the trusted and the untrusted part to TEEs and GPUs. We provide a formal DP guarantee that demonstrates that, for the same privacy guarantee, combining asymmetric data decomposition and DP requires much smaller noise compared to solely using DP without decomposition. This improves the privacy-utility trade-off significantly compared to using only DP methods without decomposition. Furthermore, we present a rank bound analysis showing that the low-rank structure is preserved after each layer across the entire model.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Ethos: Rectifying Language Models in Orthogonal Parameter Spacecited by 20
- 2022Federated Learning of Large Models at the Edge via Principal Sub-Model Trainingcited by 13
- 2023A Survey of Secure Computation Using Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 8
- 2022MPC-Pipe: an Efficient Pipeline Scheme for Secure Multi-party Machine Learning Inferencecited by 4
- 2023All Rivers Run to the Sea: Private Learning with Asymmetric Flowscited by 4
- 2024TEESlice: Protecting Sensitive Neural Network Models in Trusted Execution Environments When Attackers have Pre-Trained Modelscited by 3
- 2024Tempo: Confidentiality Preservation in Cloud-Based Neural Network Trainingcited by 2
- 2024ATP: Enabling Fast LLM Serving via Attention on Top Principal Keyscited by 1
- 2025TAO: Tolerance-Aware Optimistic Verification for Floating-Point Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2025TAO: Tolerance-Aware Optimistic Verification for Floating-Point Neural Networks15 Oct 2025
- 2024TEESlice: Protecting Sensitive Neural Network Models in Trusted Execution Environments When Attackers have Pre-Trained Models15 Nov 2024
- 2024Ethos: Rectifying Language Models in Orthogonal Parameter Space13 Mar 2024
- 2024ATP: Enabling Fast LLM Serving via Attention on Top Principal Keys1 Mar 2024
- 2024Tempo: Confidentiality Preservation in Cloud-Based Neural Network Training21 Jan 2024
- 2023All Rivers Run to the Sea: Private Learning with Asymmetric Flows5 Dec 2023
- 2023A Survey of Secure Computation Using Trusted Execution Environments23 Feb 2023
- 2022MPC-Pipe: an Efficient Pipeline Scheme for Secure Multi-party Machine Learning Inference27 Sep 2022
- 2022Federated Learning of Large Models at the Edge via Principal Sub-Model Training28 Aug 2022