mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach

arXiv 2110.00911 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has raised concerns on the risk of spurious correlations and unintended biases in statistical machine learning models that threaten model robustness and fairness. In this paper, we propose a simple and intuitive regularization approach to integrate causal knowledge during model training and build a robust and fair model by emphasizing causal features and de-emphasizing spurious features. Specifically, we first manually identify causal and spurious features with principles inspired from the counterfactual framework of causal inference. Then, we propose a regularization approach to penalize causal and spurious features separately. By adjusting the strength of the penalty for each type of feature, we build a predictive model that relies more on causal features and less on non-causal features. We conduct experiments to evaluate model robustness and fairness on three datasets with multiple metrics. Empirical results show that the new models built with causal awareness significantly improve model robustness with respect to counterfactual texts and model fairness with respect to sensitive attributes.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2021.

Builds on

24 of 44 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  4. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
  5. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  6. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
  7. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
  8. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  9. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  10. 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
  11. 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 222
  12. 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 211
12 more
  1. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  2. 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
  3. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 151
  4. 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations in Text Classification via Automatically Generated Counterfactualscited by 67
  5. 2019Operationalizing Individual Fairness with Pairwise Fair Representationscited by 64
  6. 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Human Annotationscited by 62
  7. 2020Text and Causal Inference: A Review of Using Text to Remove Confounding from Causal Estimatescited by 59
  8. 2020Identifying Spurious Correlations for Robust Text Classificationcited by 59
  9. 2020A Causal View on Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 53
  10. 2020Demographics Should Not Be the Reason of Toxicity: Mitigating Discrimination in Text Classifications with Instance Weightingcited by 41
  11. 2018Challenges of Using Text Classifiers for Causal Inferencecited by 33
  12. 2019AI and Holistic Review: Informing Human Reading in College Admissionscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

11 papers.