mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Case Study to Reveal if an Area of Interest has a Trend in Ongoing Tweets Using Word and Sentence Embeddings

arXiv 2110.00866 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the field of Natural Language Processing, information extraction from texts has been the objective of many researchers for years. Many different techniques have been applied in order to reveal the opinion that a tweet might have, thus understanding the sentiment of the small writing up to 280 characters. Other than figuring out the sentiment of a tweet, a study can also focus on finding the correlation of the tweets with a certain area of interest, which constitutes the purpose of this study. In order to reveal if an area of interest has a trend in ongoing tweets, we have proposed an easily applicable automated methodology in which the Daily Mean Similarity Scores that show the similarity between the daily tweet corpus and the target words representing our area of interest is calculated by using a na"ive correlation-based technique without training any Machine Learning Model. The Daily Mean Similarity Scores have mainly based on cosine similarity and word/sentence embeddings computed by Multilanguage Universal Sentence Encoder and showed main opinion stream of the tweets with respect to a certain area of interest, which proves that an ongoing trend of a specific subject on Twitter can easily be captured in almost real time by using the proposed methodology in this study. We have also compared the effectiveness of using word versus sentence embeddings while applying our methodology and realized that both give almost the same results, whereas using word embeddings requires less computational time than sentence embeddings, thus being more effective. This paper will start with an introduction followed by the background information about the basics, then continue with the explanation of the proposed methodology and later on finish by interpreting the results and concluding the findings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2021.

Builds on

9 of 18 references.

References · 9

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
  3. 2019Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translationcited by 309
  4. 2015Building End-To-End Dialogue Systems Using Generative Hierarchical Neural Network Modelscited by 207
  5. 2019Multilingual Universal Sentence Encoder for Semantic Retrievalcited by 192
  6. 2019Improving Multilingual Sentence Embedding using Bi-directional Dual Encoder with Additive Margin Softmaxcited by 58
  7. 2018Learning Semantic Textual Similarity from Conversationscited by 41
  8. 2018Computational International Relations: What Can Programming, Coding and Internet Research Do for the Discipline?cited by 1
  9. 2020Tweets Sentiment Analysis via Word Embeddings and Machine Learning Techniquescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.