Random Subgraph Detection Using Queries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The planted densest subgraph detection problem refers to the task of testing whether in a given (random) graph there is a subgraph that is unusually dense. Specifically, we observe an undirected and unweighted graph on n vertices. Under the null hypothesis, the graph is a realization of an ErdHos-R'enyi graph with edge probability (or, density) q. Under the alternative, there is a subgraph on k vertices with edge probability p>q. The statistical as well as the computational barriers of this problem are well-understood for a wide range of the edge parameters p and q. In this paper, we consider a natural variant of the above problem, where one can only observe a relatively small part of the graph using adaptive edge queries. For this model, we determine the number of queries necessary and sufficient (accompanied with a quasi-polynomial optimal algorithm) for detecting the presence of the planted subgraph. We also propose a polynomial-time algorithm which is able to detect the planted subgraph, albeit with more queries compared to the above lower bound. We conjecture that in the leftover regime, no polynomial-time algorithms exist. Our results resolve two open questions posed in the past literature.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2021.
Builds on
19 of 37 references.
References · 19
- 2020Reducibility and Statistical-Computational Gaps from Secret Leakagecited by 50
- 2018Reducibility and Computational Lower Bounds for Problems with Planted Sparse Structurecited by 35
- 2017Clustering with Noisy Queriescited by 34
- 2014Achieving Exact Cluster Recovery Threshold via Semidefinite Programmingcited by 32
- 2014Statistical-Computational Tradeoffs in Planted Problems and Submatrix Localization with a Growing Number of Clusters and Submatricescited by 29
- 2014Statistical and computational trade-offs in estimation of sparse principal componentscited by 26
- 2014Sparse CCA: Adaptive Estimation and Computational Barrierscited by 25
- 2014Computational Lower Bounds for Community Detection on Random Graphscited by 21
- 2017Query Complexity of Clustering with Side Informationcited by 20
- 2015Information Limits for Recovering a Hidden Communitycited by 18
- 2019Universality of Computational Lower Bounds for Submatrix Detectioncited by 13
- 2015Computational and Statistical Boundaries for Submatrix Localization in a Large Noisy Matrixcited by 12
7 more
- 2013Community Detection in Sparse Random Networkscited by 11
- 2016Average-case Hardness of RIP Certificationcited by 10
- 2015Finding One Community in a Sparse Graphcited by 8
- 2019Finding a planted clique by adaptive probingcited by 6
- 2020Finding Planted Cliques in Sublinear Timecited by 4
- 2014Clustering Evolving Networkscited by 2
- 2016Finding Planted Subgraphs with Few Eigenvalues using the Schur-Horn Relaxationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Planted Bipartite Graph Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Optimal community detection in dense bipartite graphscited by 1
- 2024Low-degree phase transitions for detecting a planted clique in sublinear timecited by 0
- 2025Optimal community detection in dense bipartite graphs23 May 2025
- 2024Low-degree phase transitions for detecting a planted clique in sublinear time8 Feb 2024
- 2023Planted Bipartite Graph Detection7 Feb 2023