mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Random Subgraph Detection Using Queries

arXiv 2110.00744 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2021cs.DS cs.IT cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The planted densest subgraph detection problem refers to the task of testing whether in a given (random) graph there is a subgraph that is unusually dense. Specifically, we observe an undirected and unweighted graph on n vertices. Under the null hypothesis, the graph is a realization of an ErdHos-R'enyi graph with edge probability (or, density) q. Under the alternative, there is a subgraph on k vertices with edge probability p>q. The statistical as well as the computational barriers of this problem are well-understood for a wide range of the edge parameters p and q. In this paper, we consider a natural variant of the above problem, where one can only observe a relatively small part of the graph using adaptive edge queries. For this model, we determine the number of queries necessary and sufficient (accompanied with a quasi-polynomial optimal algorithm) for detecting the presence of the planted subgraph. We also propose a polynomial-time algorithm which is able to detect the planted subgraph, albeit with more queries compared to the above lower bound. We conjecture that in the leftover regime, no polynomial-time algorithms exist. Our results resolve two open questions posed in the past literature.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2021.

Builds on

19 of 37 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Reducibility and Statistical-Computational Gaps from Secret Leakagecited by 50
  2. 2018Reducibility and Computational Lower Bounds for Problems with Planted Sparse Structurecited by 35
  3. 2017Clustering with Noisy Queriescited by 34
  4. 2014Achieving Exact Cluster Recovery Threshold via Semidefinite Programmingcited by 32
  5. 2014Statistical-Computational Tradeoffs in Planted Problems and Submatrix Localization with a Growing Number of Clusters and Submatricescited by 29
  6. 2014Statistical and computational trade-offs in estimation of sparse principal componentscited by 26
  7. 2014Sparse CCA: Adaptive Estimation and Computational Barrierscited by 25
  8. 2014Computational Lower Bounds for Community Detection on Random Graphscited by 21
  9. 2017Query Complexity of Clustering with Side Informationcited by 20
  10. 2015Information Limits for Recovering a Hidden Communitycited by 18
  11. 2019Universality of Computational Lower Bounds for Submatrix Detectioncited by 13
  12. 2015Computational and Statistical Boundaries for Submatrix Localization in a Large Noisy Matrixcited by 12
7 more
  1. 2013Community Detection in Sparse Random Networkscited by 11
  2. 2016Average-case Hardness of RIP Certificationcited by 10
  3. 2015Finding One Community in a Sparse Graphcited by 8
  4. 2019Finding a planted clique by adaptive probingcited by 6
  5. 2020Finding Planted Cliques in Sublinear Timecited by 4
  6. 2014Clustering Evolving Networkscited by 2
  7. 2016Finding Planted Subgraphs with Few Eigenvalues using the Schur-Horn Relaxationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.