mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ML4C: Seeing Causality Through Latent Vicinity

arXiv 2110.00637 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised Causal Learning (SCL) aims to learn causal relations from observational data by accessing previously seen datasets associated with ground truth causal relations. This paper presents a first attempt at addressing a fundamental question: What are the benefits from supervision and how does it benefit? Starting from seeing that SCL is not better than random guessing if the learning target is non-identifiable a priori, we propose a two-phase paradigm for SCL by explicitly considering structure identifiability. Following this paradigm, we tackle the problem of SCL on discrete data and propose ML4C. The core of ML4C is a binary classifier with a novel learning target: it classifies whether an Unshielded Triple (UT) is a v-structure or not. Specifically, starting from an input dataset with the corresponding skeleton provided, ML4C orients each UT once it is classified as a v-structure. These v-structures are together used to construct the final output. To address the fundamental question of SCL, we propose a principled method for ML4C featurization: we exploit the vicinity of a given UT (i.e., the neighbors of UT in skeleton), and derive features by considering the conditional dependencies and structural entanglement within the vicinity. We further prove that ML4C is asymptotically correct. Last but foremost, thorough experiments conducted on benchmark datasets demonstrate that ML4C remarkably outperforms other state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of accuracy, reliability, robustness and tolerance. In summary, ML4C shows promising results on validating the effectiveness of supervision for causal learning. Our codes are publicly available at https://github.com/microsoft/ML4C.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2021.

Builds on

14 of 52 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
  3. 2019DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 329
  4. 2013Causal Inference and Causal Explanation with Background Knowledgecited by 168
  5. 2021DiBS: Differentiable Bayesian Structure Learningcited by 105
  6. 2019Masked Gradient-Based Causal Structure Learningcited by 89
  7. 2016Discovering Causal Signals in Imagescited by 79
  8. 2019Causal Discovery Toolbox: Uncover causal relationships in Pythoncited by 49
  9. 2013Strong Completeness and Faithfulness in Bayesian Networkscited by 44
  10. 2020Supervised Whole DAG Causal Discoverycited by 19
  11. 2016Conditional distribution variability measures for causality detectioncited by 15
  12. 2014The Randomized Causation Coefficientcited by 10
2 more
  1. 2016A Review on Algorithms for Constraint-based Causal Discoverycited by 8
  2. 2014From dependency to causality: a machine learning approachcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

11 papers.