mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sentiment and structure in word co-occurrence networks on Twitter

arXiv 2110.00587 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2021cs.CL cs.CY cs.SIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We explore the relationship between context and happiness scores in political tweets using word co-occurrence networks, where nodes in the network are the words, and the weight of an edge is the number of tweets in the corpus for which the two connected words co-occur. In particular, we consider tweets with hashtags #imwithher and #crookedhillary, both relating to Hillary Clinton's presidential bid in 2016. We then analyze the network properties in conjunction with the word scores by comparing with null models to separate the effects of the network structure and the score distribution. Neutral words are found to be dominant and most words, regardless of polarity, tend to co-occur with neutral words. We do not observe any score homophily among positive and negative words. However, when we perform network backboning, community detection results in word groupings with meaningful narratives, and the happiness scores of the words in each group correspond to its respective theme. Thus, although we observe no clear relationship between happiness scores and co-occurrence at the node or edge level, a community-centric approach can isolate themes of competing sentiments in a corpus.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2021.

Builds on

20 of 76 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  4. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
  5. 2016Stance and Sentiment in Tweetscited by 62
  6. 2016Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data for Predicting Stock Market Movementscited by 34
  7. 2016Forecasting the onset and course of mental illness with Twitter datacited by 25
  8. 2017A network approach to topic modelscited by 25
  9. 2014Human language reveals a universal positivity biascited by 23
  10. 2013Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehosecited by 15
  11. 2020Storywrangler: A massive exploratorium for sociolinguistic, cultural, socioeconomic, and political timelines using Twittercited by 15
  12. 2014Zipf's law holds for phrases, not wordscited by 12
8 more
  1. 2017Network Backboning with Noisy Datacited by 11
  2. 2014Text mixing shapes the anatomy of rank-frequency distributions: A modern Zipfian mechanics for natural languagecited by 6
  3. 2021On Positivity Bias in Negative Reviewscited by 3
  4. 2016Public Opinion Polling with Twittercited by 2
  5. 2019Fame and Ultrafame: Measuring and comparing daily levels of `being talked about' for United States' presidents, their rivals, God, countries, and K-popcited by 2
  6. 2021Quantifying language changes surrounding mental health on Twittercited by 2
  7. 2021Say Their Names: Resurgence in the collective attention toward Black victims of fatal police violence following the death of George Floydcited by 2
  8. 2021Augmenting semantic lexicons using word embeddings and transfer learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.