mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Which Design Decisions in AI-enabled Mobile Applications Contribute to Greener AI?

arXiv 2109.15284 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.SEcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: The construction, evolution and usage of complex artificial intelligence (AI) models demand expensive computational resources. While currently available high-performance computing environments support well this complexity, the deployment of AI models in mobile devices, which is an increasing trend, is challenging. Mobile applications consist of environments with low computational resources and hence imply limitations in the design decisions during the AI-enabled software engineering lifecycle that balance the trade-off between the accuracy and the complexity of the mobile applications. Objective: Our objective is to systematically assess the trade-off between accuracy and complexity when deploying complex AI models (e.g. neural networks) to mobile devices, which have an implicit resource limitation. We aim to cover (i) the impact of the design decisions on the achievement of high-accuracy and low resource-consumption implementations; and (ii) the validation of profiling tools for systematically promoting greener AI. Method: This confirmatory registered report consists of a plan to conduct an empirical study to quantify the implications of the design decisions on AI-enabled applications performance and to report experiences of the end-to-end AI-enabled software engineering lifecycle. Concretely, we will implement both image-based and language-based neural networks in mobile applications to solve multiple image classification and text classification problems on different benchmark datasets. Overall, we plan to model the accuracy and complexity of AI-enabled applications in operation with respect to their design decisions and will provide tools for allowing practitioners to gain consciousness of the quantitative relationship between the design decisions and the green characteristics of study.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2021.

Builds on

16 of 58 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  6. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  7. 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
  8. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  9. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
  10. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
  11. 2021Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Surveycited by 68
  12. 2019An Empirical Study towards Characterizing Deep Learning Development and Deployment across Different Frameworks and Platformscited by 35
4 more
  1. 2019Catalog of Energy Patterns for Mobile Applicationscited by 8
  2. 2021Integration of Convolutional Neural Networks in Mobile Applicationscited by 6
  3. 2019EMaaS: Energy Measurements as a Service for Mobile Applicationscited by 3
  4. 2018Using Automatic Refactoring to Improve Energy Efficiency of Android Appscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

6 papers.