Scale-invariant Learning by Physics Inversion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Solving inverse problems, such as parameter estimation and optimal control, is a vital part of science. Many experiments repeatedly collect data and rely on machine learning algorithms to quickly infer solutions to the associated inverse problems. We find that state-of-the-art training techniques are not well-suited to many problems that involve physical processes. The highly nonlinear behavior, common in physical processes, results in strongly varying gradients that lead first-order optimizers like SGD or Adam to compute suboptimal optimization directions. We propose a novel hybrid training approach that combines higher-order optimization methods with machine learning techniques. We take updates from a scale-invariant inverse problem solver and embed them into the gradient-descent-based learning pipeline, replacing the regular gradient of the physical process. We demonstrate the capabilities of our method on a variety of canonical physical systems, showing that it yields significant improvements on a wide range of optimization and learning problems.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2021.
Builds on
14 of 68 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
- 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 413
- 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
- 2020ADAHESSIAN: An Adaptive Second Order Optimizer for Machine Learningcited by 201
- 2020Learning to Control PDEs with Differentiable Physicscited by 131
- 2017Deep Learning for Real-time Gravitational Wave Detection and Parameter Estimation: Results with Advanced LIGO Datacited by 33
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Solving Inverse Physics Problems with Score Matchingcited by 15
- 2023Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrologycited by 11
- 2024Approximating Numerical Fluxes Using Fourier Neural Operators for Hyperbolic Conservation Lawscited by 10
- 2024Metamizer: a versatile neural optimizer for fast and accurate physics simulationscited by 7
- 2024Neural Operators Learn the Local Physics of Magnetohydrodynamicscited by 2
- 2025A spectral clustering-type algorithm for the consistent estimation of the Hurst distribution in moderately high dimensionscited by 0
- 2025A spectral clustering-type algorithm for the consistent estimation of the Hurst distribution in moderately high dimensions30 Jan 2025
- 2024Metamizer: a versatile neural optimizer for fast and accurate physics simulations10 Oct 2024
- 2024Neural Operators Learn the Local Physics of Magnetohydrodynamics24 Apr 2024
- 2024Approximating Numerical Fluxes Using Fourier Neural Operators for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws3 Jan 2024
- 2023Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrology8 Oct 2023
- 2023Solving Inverse Physics Problems with Score Matching24 Jan 2023