mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can phones, syllables, and words emerge as side-products of cross-situational audiovisual learning? -- A computational investigation

arXiv 2109.14200 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2021eess.AS cs.AI cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decades of research has studied how language learning infants learn to discriminate speech sounds, segment words, and associate words with their meanings. While gradual development of such capabilities is unquestionable, the exact nature of these skills and the underlying mental representations yet remains unclear. In parallel, computational studies have shown that basic comprehension of speech can be achieved by statistical learning between speech and concurrent referentially ambiguous visual input. These models can operate without prior linguistic knowledge such as representations of linguistic units, and without learning mechanisms specifically targeted at such units. This has raised the question of to what extent knowledge of linguistic units, such as phone(me)s, syllables, and words, could actually emerge as latent representations supporting the translation between speech and representations in other modalities, and without the units being proximal learning targets for the learner. In this study, we formulate this idea as the so-called latent language hypothesis (LLH), connecting linguistic representation learning to general predictive processing within and across sensory modalities. We review the extent that the audiovisual aspect of LLH is supported by the existing computational studies. We then explore LLH further in extensive learning simulations with different neural network models for audiovisual cross-situational learning, and comparing learning from both synthetic and real speech data. We investigate whether the latent representations learned by the networks reflect phonetic, syllabic, or lexical structure of input speech by utilizing an array of complementary evaluation metrics related to linguistic selectivity and temporal characteristics of the representations. As a result, we find that representations associated...

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2021.

Builds on

30 of 104 references.

References · 30

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  6. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  7. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  8. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  9. 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 591
  10. 2017Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 550
  11. 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
  12. 2018Jointly Discovering Visual Objects and Spoken Words from Raw Sensory Inputcited by 81
18 more
  1. 2015Deep Multimodal Semantic Embeddings for Speech and Imagescited by 56
  2. 2020Text-Free Image-to-Speech Synthesis Using Learned Segmental Unitscited by 50
  3. 2019Learning Hierarchical Discrete Linguistic Units from Visually-Grounded Speechcited by 44
  4. 2017Representations of language in a model of visually grounded speech signalcited by 37
  5. 2017Learning Word-Like Units from Joint Audio-Visual Analysiscited by 27
  6. 2017Encoding of phonology in a recurrent neural model of grounded speechcited by 27
  7. 2019Language learning using Speech to Image retrievalcited by 21
  8. 2017Semantic speech retrieval with a visually grounded model of untranscribed speechcited by 20
  9. 2017Visually grounded learning of keyword prediction from untranscribed speechcited by 16
  10. 2020Analyzing analytical methods: The case of phonology in neural models of spoken languagecited by 16
  11. 2019Towards Visually Grounded Sub-Word Speech Unit Discoverycited by 15
  12. 2019Models of Visually Grounded Speech Signal Pay Attention To Nouns: a Bilingual Experiment on English and Japanesecited by 13
  13. 2019Word Recognition, Competition, and Activation in a Model of Visually Grounded Speechcited by 13
  14. 2019A computational model of early language acquisition from audiovisual experiences of young infantscited by 10
  15. 2020Catplayinginthesnow: Impact of Prior Segmentation on a Model of Visually Grounded Speechcited by 9
  16. 2017SPEECH-COCO: 600k Visually Grounded Spoken Captions Aligned to MSCOCO Data Setcited by 7
  17. 2020Learning to Recognise Words using Visually Grounded Speechcited by 7
  18. 2017Language Bootstrapping: Learning Word Meanings From Perception-Action Associationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

12 papers.