mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparison of atlas-based and neural-network-based semantic segmentation for DENSE MRI images

arXiv 2109.14116 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Two segmentation methods, one atlas-based and one neural-network-based, were compared to see how well they can each automatically segment the brain stem and cerebellum in Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DENSE-MRI) data. The segmentation is a pre-requisite for estimating the average displacements in these regions, which have recently been proposed as biomarkers in the diagnosis of Chiari Malformation type I (CMI). In numerical experiments, the segmentations of both methods were similar to manual segmentations provided by trained experts. It was found that, overall, the neural-network-based method alone produced more accurate segmentations than the atlas-based method did alone, but that a combination of the two methods -- in which the atlas-based method is used for the segmentation of the brain stem and the neural-network is used for the segmentation of the cerebellum -- may be the most successful.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2021.

Builds on

4 of 17 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2019SegSort: Segmentation by Discriminative Sorting of Segmentscited by 96
  3. 2020Importance-Aware Semantic Segmentation in Self-Driving with Discrete Wasserstein Trainingcited by 27
  4. 2021Semantic Segmentation by Improved Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.