mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

f-Cal: Calibrated aleatoric uncertainty estimation from neural networks for robot perception

arXiv 2109.13913 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2021cs.CV cs.LG cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While modern deep neural networks are performant perception modules, performance (accuracy) alone is insufficient, particularly for safety-critical robotic applications such as self-driving vehicles. Robot autonomy stacks also require these otherwise blackbox models to produce reliable and calibrated measures of confidence on their predictions. Existing approaches estimate uncertainty from these neural network perception stacks by modifying network architectures, inference procedure, or loss functions. However, in general, these methods lack calibration, meaning that the predictive uncertainties do not faithfully represent the true underlying uncertainties (process noise). Our key insight is that calibration is only achieved by imposing constraints across multiple examples, such as those in a mini-batch; as opposed to existing approaches which only impose constraints per-sample, often leading to overconfident (thus miscalibrated) uncertainty estimates. By enforcing the distribution of outputs of a neural network to resemble a target distribution by minimizing an f-divergence, we obtain significantly better-calibrated models compared to prior approaches. Our approach, f-Cal, outperforms existing uncertainty calibration approaches on robot perception tasks such as object detection and monocular depth estimation over multiple real-world benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2021.

Builds on

27 of 50 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  6. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  7. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  8. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  9. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  10. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  11. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  12. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
15 more
  1. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  2. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  3. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  4. 2019From Big to Small: Multi-Scale Local Planar Guidance for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 379
  5. 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
  6. 2015Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understandingcited by 218
  7. 2018Bounding Box Regression with Uncertainty for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 143
  8. 2019Distribution Calibration for Regressioncited by 88
  9. 2019Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Taskscited by 85
  10. 2018Lightweight Probabilistic Deep Networkscited by 77
  11. 2020Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 77
  12. 2018Probabilistic Object Detection: Definition and Evaluationcited by 55
  13. 2016Backprop KF: Learning Discriminative Deterministic State Estimatorscited by 47
  14. 2020Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 36
  15. 2019Can We Trust You? On Calibration of a Probabilistic Object Detector for Autonomous Drivingcited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2.

3 papers.