mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Using neural networks to solve the 2D Poisson equation for electric field computation in plasma fluid simulations

arXiv 2109.13076 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2021cs.LG physics.plasm-phcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Poisson equation is critical to get a self-consistent solution in plasma fluid simulations used for Hall effect thrusters and streamer discharges, since the Poisson solution appears as a source term of the unsteady nonlinear flow equations. As a first step, solving the 2D Poisson equation with zero Dirichlet boundary conditions using a deep neural network is investigated using multiple-scale architectures, defined in terms of number of branches, depth and receptive field. One key objective is to better understand how neural networks learn the Poisson solutions and provide guidelines to achieve optimal network configurations, especially when coupled to the time-varying Euler equations with plasma source terms. Here, the Receptive Field is found critical to correctly capture large topological structures of the field. The investigation of multiple architectures, losses, and hyperparameters provides an optimal network to solve accurately the steady Poisson problem. The performance of the optimal neural network solver, called PlasmaNet, is then monitored on meshes with increasing number of nodes, and compared with classical parallel linear solvers. Next, PlasmaNet is coupled with an unsteady Euler plasma fluid equations solver in the context of the electron plasma oscillation test case. In this time-evolving problem, a physical loss is necessary to produce a stable simulation. PlasmaNet is finally tested on a more complex case of discharge propagation involving chemistry and advection. The guidelines established in previous sections are applied to build the CNN to solve the same Poisson equation in cylindrical coordinates with different boundary conditions. Results reveal good CNN predictions and pave the way to new computational strategies using modern GPU-based hardware to predict unsteady problems involving a Poisson equation.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2021.

Builds on

13 of 38 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  4. 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 549
  5. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  6. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 362
  7. 2015Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square errorcited by 297
  8. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 201
  9. 2018Deep Learning Methods for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Airfoil Flowscited by 147
  10. 2016Accelerating Eulerian Fluid Simulation With Convolutional Networkscited by 128
  11. 2019Poisson CNN: Convolutional neural networks for the solution of the Poisson equation on a Cartesian meshcited by 22
  12. 2021Performance and accuracy assessments of an incompressible fluid solver coupled with a deep Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 8
1 more
  1. 2020Learning Incompressible Fluid Dynamics from Scratch -- Towards Fast, Differentiable Fluid Models that Generalizecited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 7; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

10 papers.