mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking the Status of Default Pseudorandom Number Generators in Common Programming Languages

arXiv 2109.12997 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2021cs.PLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ever-increasing need for random numbers is clear in many areas of computer science, from neural networks to optimization. As such, most common programming language provide easy access to Pseudorandom Number Generators. However, these generators are not all made equal, and empirical verification has previously shown some to be flawed in key ways. Because of the constant changes in programming languages, we perform the same empirical benchmarking using large batteries of statistcal tests on a wide array of PRNGs, and identify that while some languages have improved significantly over the years, there are still cases where the default PRNG fails to deliver sufficiently random results.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.