Improving Uncertainty of Deep Learning-based Object Classification on Radar Spectra using Label Smoothing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Object type classification for automotive radar has greatly improved with recent deep learning (DL) solutions, however these developments have mostly focused on the classification accuracy. Before employing DL solutions in safety-critical applications, such as automated driving, an indispensable prerequisite is the accurate quantification of the classifiers' reliability. Unfortunately, DL classifiers are characterized as black-box systems which output severely over-confident predictions, leading downstream decision-making systems to false conclusions with possibly catastrophic consequences. We find that deep radar classifiers maintain high-confidences for ambiguous, difficult samples, e.g. small objects measured at large distances, under domain shift and signal corruptions, regardless of the correctness of the predictions. The focus of this article is to learn deep radar spectra classifiers which offer robust real-time uncertainty estimates using label smoothing during training. Label smoothing is a technique of refining, or softening, the hard labels typically available in classification datasets. In this article, we exploit radar-specific know-how to define soft labels which encourage the classifiers to learn to output high-quality calibrated uncertainty estimates, thereby partially resolving the problem of over-confidence. Our investigations show how simple radar knowledge can easily be combined with complex data-driven learning algorithms to yield safe automotive radar perception.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2021.
Builds on
15 of 31 references.
References · 15
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2019Sampling-free Epistemic Uncertainty Estimation Using Approximated Variance Propagationcited by 74
- 2021RODNet: A Real-Time Radar Object Detection Network Cross-Supervised by Camera-Radar Fused Object 3D Localizationcited by 49
- 2020CNN based Road User Detection using the 3D Radar Cubecited by 47
- 2020Multi-Class Uncertainty Calibration via Mutual Information Maximization-based Binningcited by 27
- 2019On-manifold Adversarial Data Augmentation Improves Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Radars for Autonomous Driving: A Review of Deep Learning Methods and Challengescited by 10
- 2022A recurrent CNN for online object detection on raw radar framescited by 9
- 2023Calibrating the Rigged Lottery: Making All Tickets Reliablecited by 4
- 2024Embracing Unknown Step by Step: Towards Reliable Sparse Training in Real Worldcited by 1
- 2024Embracing Unknown Step by Step: Towards Reliable Sparse Training in Real World29 Mar 2024
- 2023Radars for Autonomous Driving: A Review of Deep Learning Methods and Challenges15 Jun 2023
- 2023Calibrating the Rigged Lottery: Making All Tickets Reliable18 Feb 2023
- 2022A recurrent CNN for online object detection on raw radar frames21 Dec 2022