mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Discovering PDEs from Multiple Experiments

arXiv 2109.11939 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2021stat.ML cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated model discovery of partial differential equations (PDEs) usually considers a single experiment or dataset to infer the underlying governing equations. In practice, experiments have inherent natural variability in parameters, initial and boundary conditions that cannot be simply averaged out. We introduce a randomised adaptive group Lasso sparsity estimator to promote grouped sparsity and implement it in a deep learning based PDE discovery framework. It allows to create a learning bias that implies the a priori assumption that all experiments can be explained by the same underlying PDE terms with potentially different coefficients. Our experimental results show more generalizable PDEs can be found from multiple highly noisy datasets, by this grouped sparsity promotion rather than simply performing independent model discoveries.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2021.

Builds on

5 of 15 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  2. 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 70
  3. 2019Stability selection enables robust learning of partial differential equations from limited noisy datacited by 7
  4. 2020Learning physically consistent mathematical models from data using group sparsitycited by 4
  5. 2021Sparsistent Model Discoverycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.