mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Dynamics from Noisy Measurements using Deep Learning with a Runge-Kutta Constraint

arXiv 2109.11446 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2021cs.LG math.DScited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Measurement noise is an integral part while collecting data of a physical process. Thus, noise removal is a necessary step to draw conclusions from these data, and it often becomes quite essential to construct dynamical models using these data. We discuss a methodology to learn differential equation(s) using noisy and sparsely sampled measurements. In our methodology, the main innovation can be seen in of integration of deep neural networks with a classical numerical integration method. Precisely, we aim at learning a neural network that implicitly represents the data and an additional neural network that models the vector fields of the dependent variables. We combine these two networks by enforcing the constraint that the data at the next time-steps can be given by following a numerical integration scheme such as the fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme. The proposed framework to learn a model predicting the vector field is highly effective under noisy measurements. The approach can handle scenarios where dependent variables are not available at the same temporal grid. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method to learning models using data obtained from various differential equations. The proposed approach provides a promising methodology to learn dynamic models, where the first-principle understanding remains opaque.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2021.

Builds on

17 of 59 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  5. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  6. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  7. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 491
  8. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 335
  9. 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
  10. 2017Learning Koopman Invariant Subspaces for Dynamic Mode Decompositioncited by 156
  11. 2018Data-Driven Forecasting of High-Dimensional Chaotic Systems with Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 155
  12. 2017Learning Deep Neural Network Representations for Koopman Operators of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 125
5 more
  1. 2018Multistep Neural Networks for Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 88
  2. 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 70
  3. 2018Hybrid Forecasting of Chaotic Processes: Using Machine Learning in Conjunction with a Knowledge-Based Modelcited by 57
  4. 2021Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems using a Runge-Kutta Inspired Dictionary-based Sparse Regression Approachcited by 36
  5. 2018Long-time predictive modeling of nonlinear dynamical systems using neural networkscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

7 papers.