mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unbiased Loss Functions for Multilabel Classification with Missing Labels

arXiv 2109.11282 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper considers binary and multilabel classification problems in a setting where labels are missing independently and with a known rate. Missing labels are a ubiquitous phenomenon in extreme multi-label classification (XMC) tasks, such as matching Wikipedia articles to a small subset out of the hundreds of thousands of possible tags, where no human annotator can possibly check the validity of all the negative samples. For this reason, propensity-scored precision -- an unbiased estimate for precision-at-k under a known noise model -- has become one of the standard metrics in XMC. Few methods take this problem into account already during the training phase, and all are limited to loss functions that can be decomposed into a sum of contributions from each individual label. A typical approach to training is to reduce the multilabel problem into a series of binary or multiclass problems, and it has been shown that if the surrogate task should be consistent for optimizing recall, the resulting loss function is not decomposable over labels. Therefore, this paper derives the unique unbiased estimators for the different multilabel reductions, including the non-decomposable ones. These estimators suffer from increased variance and may lead to ill-posed optimization problems, which we address by switching to convex upper-bounds. The theoretical considerations are further supplemented by an experimental study showing that the switch to unbiased estimators significantly alters the bias-variance trade-off and may thus require stronger regularization, which in some cases can negate the benefits of unbiased estimation.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2021.

Builds on

17 of 52 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  3. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  4. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  5. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  6. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  7. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 155
  8. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  9. 2018AttentionXML: Label Tree-based Attention-Aware Deep Model for High-Performance Extreme Multi-Label Text Classificationcited by 101
  10. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  11. 2016DiSMEC - Distributed Sparse Machines for Extreme Multi-label Classificationcited by 70
  12. 2013Large-scale Multi-label Learning with Missing Labelscited by 58
5 more
  1. 2014Making Risk Minimization Tolerant to Label Noisecited by 54
  2. 2020Unbiased Risk Estimators Can Mislead: A Case Study of Learning with Complementary Labelscited by 29
  3. 2015LSHTC: A Benchmark for Large-Scale Text Classificationcited by 22
  4. 2016Analysis and Optimization of Loss Functions for Multiclass, Top-k, and Multilabel Classificationcited by 20
  5. 2015Surrogate Functions for Maximizing Precision at the Topcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 4.

5 papers.