mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Clustering performance analysis using a new correlation-based cluster validity index

arXiv 2109.11172 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2021stat.ML cs.CV cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There are various cluster validity indices used for evaluating clustering results. One of the main objectives of using these indices is to seek the optimal unknown number of clusters. Some indices work well for clusters with different densities, sizes, and shapes. Yet, one shared weakness of those validity indices is that they often provide only one optimal number of clusters. That number is unknown in real-world problems, and there might be more than one possible option. We develop a new cluster validity index based on a correlation between an actual distance between a pair of data points and a centroid distance of clusters that the two points occupy. Our proposed index constantly yields several local peaks and overcomes the previously stated weakness. Several experiments in different scenarios, including UCI real-world data sets, have been conducted to compare the proposed validity index with several well-known ones. An R package related to this new index called NCvalid is available at https://github.com/nwiroonsri/NCvalid.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2021.

Builds on

2 of 58 references.

References · 2

  1. 2016Towards K-means-friendly Spaces: Simultaneous Deep Learning and Clusteringcited by 237
  2. 2019Linking Points With Labels in 3D: A Review of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentationcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

9 papers.