mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Controlled Evaluation of Grammatical Knowledge in Mandarin Chinese Language Models

arXiv 2109.11058 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prior work has shown that structural supervision helps English language models learn generalizations about syntactic phenomena such as subject-verb agreement. However, it remains unclear if such an inductive bias would also improve language models' ability to learn grammatical dependencies in typologically different languages. Here we investigate this question in Mandarin Chinese, which has a logographic, largely syllable-based writing system; different word order; and sparser morphology than English. We train LSTMs, Recurrent Neural Network Grammars, Transformer language models, and Transformer-parameterized generative parsing models on two Mandarin Chinese datasets of different sizes. We evaluate the models' ability to learn different aspects of Mandarin grammar that assess syntactic and semantic relationships. We find suggestive evidence that structural supervision helps with representing syntactic state across intervening content and improves performance in low-data settings, suggesting that the benefits of hierarchical inductive biases in acquiring dependency relationships may extend beyond English.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2021.

Builds on

22 of 46 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,090
  4. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  5. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
  6. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
  7. 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 213
  8. 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 199
  9. 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 165
  10. 2019Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic Statecited by 138
  11. 2018Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Trainingcited by 117
  12. 2016Recurrent Neural Network Grammarscited by 109
10 more
  1. 2020Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Evaluation of Word Prediction Modelscited by 55
  2. 2021CLiMP: A Benchmark for Chinese Language Model Evaluationcited by 46
  3. 2018Finding Syntax in Human Encephalography with Beam Searchcited by 41
  4. 2017Effective Inference for Generative Neural Parsingcited by 25
  5. 2021Structural Guidance for Transformer Language Modelscited by 25
  6. 2019Structural Supervision Improves Learning of Non-Local Grammatical Dependenciescited by 24
  7. 2020Recurrent Neural Network Language Models Always Learn English-Like Relative Clause Attachmentcited by 18
  8. 2018Can LSTM Learn to Capture Agreement? The Case of Basquecited by 17
  9. 2017Character-based Joint Segmentation and POS Tagging for Chinese using Bidirectional RNN-CRFcited by 16
  10. 2019Representation of Constituents in Neural Language Models: Coordination Phrase as a Case Studycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.