mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The power of private likelihood-ratio tests for goodness-of-fit in frequency tables

arXiv 2109.09630 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2021math.ST stat.ME stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy-protecting data analysis investigates statistical methods under privacy constraints. This is a rising challenge in modern statistics, as the achievement of confidentiality guarantees, which typically occurs through suitable perturbations of the data, may determine a loss in the statistical utility of the data. In this paper, we consider privacy-protecting tests for goodness-of-fit in frequency tables, this being arguably the most common form of releasing data, and present a rigorous analysis of the large sample behaviour of a private likelihood-ratio (LR) test. Under the framework of (varepsilon,δ)-differential privacy for perturbed data, our main contribution is the power analysis of the private LR test, which characterizes the trade-off between confidentiality, measured via the differential privacy parameters (varepsilon,δ), and statistical utility, measured via the power of the test. This is obtained through a Bahadur-Rao large deviation expansion for the power of the private LR test, bringing out a critical quantity, as a function of the sample size, the dimension of the table and (varepsilon,δ), that determines a loss in the power of the test. Such a result is then applied to characterize the impact of the sample size and the dimension of the table, in connection with the parameters (varepsilon,δ), on the loss of the power of the private LR test. In particular, we determine the (sample) cost of (varepsilon,δ)-differential privacy in the private LR test, namely the additional sample size that is required to recover the power of the Multinomial LR test in the absence of perturbation. Our power analysis rely on a non-standard large deviation analysis for the LR, as well as the development of a novel (sharp) large deviation principle for sum of i.i.d. random vectors, which is of independent interest.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

Builds on

12 of 48 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  2. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
  3. 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
  4. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
  5. 2015Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 55
  6. 2018The Structure of Optimal Private Tests for Simple Hypothesescited by 26
  7. 2017Differentially Private Testing of Identity and Closeness of Discrete Distributionscited by 25
  8. 2016Differentially Private Chi-Squared Hypothesis Testing: Goodness of Fit and Independence Testingcited by 24
  9. 2019Private Identity Testing for High-Dimensional Distributionscited by 15
  10. 2017Priv'IT: Private and Sample Efficient Identity Testingcited by 10
  11. 2018Differentially Private Change-Point Detectioncited by 7
  12. 2016A New Class of Private Chi-Square Testscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.