mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Ubiquitous Indoor Positioning: Comparing Systems across Heterogeneous Datasets

arXiv 2109.09436 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2021eess.SY cs.LG cs.PFcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The evaluation of Indoor Positioning Systems (IPS) mostly relies on local deployments in the researchers' or partners' facilities. The complexity of preparing comprehensive experiments, collecting data, and considering multiple scenarios usually limits the evaluation area and, therefore, the assessment of the proposed systems. The requirements and features of controlled experiments cannot be generalized since the use of the same sensors or anchors density cannot be guaranteed. The dawn of datasets is pushing IPS evaluation to a similar level as machine-learning models, where new proposals are evaluated over many heterogeneous datasets. This paper proposes a way to evaluate IPSs in multiple scenarios, that is validated with three use cases. The results prove that the proposed aggregation of the evaluation metric values is a useful tool for high-level comparison of IPSs.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

Builds on

3 of 28 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 218
  2. 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 140
  3. 2017Accurate Real Time Localization Tracking in A Clinical Environment using Bluetooth Low Energy and Deep Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.