mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Structured Pattern Pruning Using Regularization

arXiv 2109.08814 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Iterative Magnitude Pruning (IMP) is a network pruning method that repeats the process of removing weights with the least magnitudes and retraining the model. When visualizing the weight matrices of language models pruned by IMP, previous research has shown that a structured pattern emerges, wherein the resulting surviving weights tend to prominently cluster in a select few rows and columns of the matrix. Though the need for further research in utilizing these structured patterns for potential performance gains has previously been indicated, it has yet to be thoroughly studied. We propose SPUR (Structured Pattern pruning Using Regularization), a novel pruning mechanism that preemptively induces structured patterns in compression by adding a regularization term to the objective function in the IMP. Our results show that SPUR can significantly preserve model performance under high sparsity settings regardless of the language or the task. Our contributions are as follows: (i) We propose SPUR, a network pruning mechanism that improves upon IMP regardless of the language or the task. (ii) We are the first to empirically verify the efficacy of "structured patterns" observed previously in pruning research. (iii) SPUR is a resource-efficient mechanism in that it does not require significant additional computations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2021.

Builds on

15 of 17 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  4. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  5. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  6. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
  7. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
  8. 2020Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuningcited by 398
  9. 2019CamemBERT: a Tasty French Language Modelcited by 368
  10. 2020Compressing BERT: Studying the Effects of Weight Pruning on Transfer Learningcited by 184
  11. 2020Compressing Large-Scale Transformer-Based Models: A Case Study on BERTcited by 95
  12. 2020FQuAD: French Question Answering Datasetcited by 58
3 more
  1. 2019KorQuAD1.0: Korean QA Dataset for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 43
  2. 2020KorNLI and KorSTS: New Benchmark Datasets for Korean Natural Language Understandingcited by 37
  3. 2019Reweighted Proximal Pruning for Large-Scale Language Representationcited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.