Dense Pruning of Pointwise Convolutions in the Frequency Domain
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Depthwise separable convolutions and frequency-domain convolutions are two recent ideas for building efficient convolutional neural networks. They are seemingly incompatible: the vast majority of operations in depthwise separable CNNs are in pointwise convolutional layers, but pointwise layers use 1x1 kernels, which do not benefit from frequency transformation. This paper unifies these two ideas by transforming the activations, not the kernels. Our key insights are that 1) pointwise convolutions commute with frequency transformation and thus can be computed in the frequency domain without modification, 2) each channel within a given layer has a different level of sensitivity to frequency domain pruning, and 3) each channel's sensitivity to frequency pruning is approximately monotonic with respect to frequency. We leverage this knowledge by proposing a new technique which wraps each pointwise layer in a discrete cosine transform (DCT) which is truncated to selectively prune coefficients above a given threshold as per the needs of each channel. To learn which frequencies should be pruned from which channels, we introduce a novel learned parameter which specifies each channel's pruning threshold. We add a new regularization term which incentivizes the model to decrease the number of retained frequencies while still maintaining task accuracy. Unlike weight pruning techniques which rely on sparse operators, our contiguous frequency band pruning results in fully dense computation. We apply our technique to MobileNetV2 and in the process reduce computation time by 22% and incur <1% accuracy degradation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2021.
Builds on
20 of 27 references.
References · 20
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,194
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
- 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
- 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 697
8 more
- 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 438
- 2018AMC: AutoML for Model Compression and Acceleration on Mobile Devicescited by 375
- 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 298
- 2018Discrimination-aware Channel Pruning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 171
- 2019Drop an Octave: Reducing Spatial Redundancy in Convolutional Neural Networks with Octave Convolutioncited by 140
- 2013Fast Training of Convolutional Networks through FFTscited by 89
- 2019Pruning from Scratchcited by 72
- 2018DeepN-JPEG: A Deep Neural Network Favorable JPEG-based Image Compression Frameworkcited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.