mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RaWaNet: Enriching Graph Neural Network Input via Random Walks on Graphs

arXiv 2109.07555 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, graph neural networks (GNNs) have gained increasing popularity and have shown very promising results for data that are represented by graphs. The majority of GNN architectures are designed based on developing new convolutional and/or pooling layers that better extract the hidden and deeper representations of the graphs to be used for different prediction tasks. The inputs to these layers are mainly the three default descriptors of a graph, node features (X), adjacency matrix (A), and edge features (W) (if available). To provide a more enriched input to the network, we propose a random walk data processing of the graphs based on three selected lengths. Namely, (regular) walks of length 1 and 2, and a fractional walk of length γ ∈ (0,1), in order to capture the different local and global dynamics on the graphs. We also calculate the stationary distribution of each random walk, which is then used as a scaling factor for the initial node features (X). This way, for each graph, the network receives multiple adjacency matrices along with their individual weighting for the node features. We test our method on various molecular datasets by passing the processed node features to the network in order to perform several classification and regression tasks. Interestingly, our method, not using edge features which are heavily exploited in molecular graph learning, let a shallow network outperform well known deep GNNs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2021.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  3. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  5. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  6. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  7. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  8. 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,097
  9. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
  10. 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,037
  11. 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 878
  12. 2015Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprintscited by 751
10 more
  1. 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
  2. 2020Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Countingcited by 312
  3. 2015Diffusion-Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 268
  4. 2015Order Matters: Sequence to sequence for setscited by 236
  5. 2017CayleyNets: Graph Convolutional Neural Networks with Complex Rational Spectral Filterscited by 203
  6. 2018Optimization of Molecules via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 199
  7. 2020Directional Graph Networkscited by 132
  8. 2020GraphNorm: A Principled Approach to Accelerating Graph Neural Network Trainingcited by 116
  9. 2021Geometric Deep Learning on Molecular Representationscited by 113
  10. 2018PotentialNet for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 46

Built on by

Not cited yet.