mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A trainable monogenic ConvNet layer robust in front of large contrast changes in image classification

arXiv 2109.06926 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2021cs.CV cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) at present achieve remarkable performance in image classification tasks. However, current ConvNets cannot guarantee the capabilities of the mammalian visual systems such as invariance to contrast and illumination changes. Some ideas to overcome the illumination and contrast variations usually have to be tuned manually and tend to fail when tested with other types of data degradation. In this context, we present a new bio-inspired {entry} layer, M6, which detects low-level geometric features (lines, edges, and orientations) which are similar to patterns detected by the V1 visual cortex. This new trainable layer is capable of coping with image classification even with large contrast variations. The explanation for this behavior is the monogenic signal geometry, which represents each pixel value in a 3D space using quaternions, a fact that confers a degree of explainability to the networks. We compare M6 with a conventional convolutional layer (C) and a deterministic quaternion local phase layer (Q9). The experimental setup {is designed to evaluate the robustness} of our M6 enriched ConvNet model and includes three architectures, four datasets, three types of contrast degradation (including non-uniform haze degradations). The numerical results reveal that the models with M6 are the most robust in front of any kind of contrast variations. This amounts to a significant enhancement of the C models, which usually have reasonably good performance only when the same training and test degradation are used, except for the case of maximum degradation. Moreover, the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) is used to analyze and explain the robustness effect of the M6 feature maps under any kind of contrast degradations.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2021.

Builds on

14 of 52 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  3. 2017Deformable Convolutional Networkscited by 1,481
  4. 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,154
  5. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
  6. 2016Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filteringcited by 517
  7. 2016Harmonic Networks: Deep Translation and Rotation Equivariancecited by 293
  8. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
  9. 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
  10. 2017Learning to Compose Domain-Specific Transformations for Data Augmentationcited by 91
  11. 2018Data augmentation instead of explicit regularizationcited by 62
  12. 2017A Generic Deep Architecture for Single Image Reflection Removal and Image Smoothingcited by 60
2 more
  1. 2020ALCN: Adaptive Local Contrast Normalizationcited by 2
  2. 2020Learnable Gabor modulated complex-valued networks for orientation robustnesscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.