mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hardware-aware Real-time Myocardial Segmentation Quality Control in Contrast Echocardiography

arXiv 2109.06909 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2021eess.IV cs.CV physics.med-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic myocardial segmentation of contrast echocardiography has shown great potential in the quantification of myocardial perfusion parameters. Segmentation quality control is an important step to ensure the accuracy of segmentation results for quality research as well as its clinical application. Usually, the segmentation quality control happens after the data acquisition. At the data acquisition time, the operator could not know the quality of the segmentation results. On-the-fly segmentation quality control could help the operator to adjust the ultrasound probe or retake data if the quality is unsatisfied, which can greatly reduce the effort of time-consuming manual correction. However, it is infeasible to deploy state-of-the-art DNN-based models because the segmentation module and quality control module must fit in the limited hardware resource on the ultrasound machine while satisfying strict latency constraints. In this paper, we propose a hardware-aware neural architecture search framework for automatic myocardial segmentation and quality control of contrast echocardiography. We explicitly incorporate the hardware latency as a regularization term into the loss function during training. The proposed method searches the best neural network architecture for the segmentation module and quality prediction module with strict latency.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2021.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  2. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,798
  3. 2018ProxylessNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search on Target Task and Hardwarecited by 673
  4. 2018FBNet: Hardware-Aware Efficient ConvNet Design via Differentiable Neural Architecture Searchcited by 485
  5. 2017Large-Scale Evolution of Image Classifierscited by 348
  6. 2016Designing Neural Network Architectures using Reinforcement Learningcited by 279
  7. 2018Bayesian QuickNAT: Model Uncertainty in Deep Whole-Brain Segmentation for Structure-wise Quality Controlcited by 39
  8. 2019Accuracy vs. Efficiency: Achieving Both through FPGA-Implementation Aware Neural Architecture Searchcited by 38
  9. 2017Reverse Classification Accuracy: Predicting Segmentation Performance in the Absence of Ground Truthcited by 35
  10. 2018Real-time Prediction of Segmentation Qualitycited by 23
  11. 2018Inherent Brain Segmentation Quality Control from Fully ConvNet Monte Carlo Samplingcited by 20
  12. 2018Uncertainty-driven Sanity Check: Application to Postoperative Brain Tumor Cavity Segmentationcited by 11
4 more
  1. 2019MSU-Net: Multiscale Statistical U-Net for Real-time 3D Cardiac MRI Video Segmentationcited by 7
  2. 2018VoxelAtlasGAN: 3D Left Ventricle Segmentation on Echocardiography with Atlas Guided Generation and Voxel-to-voxel Discriminationcited by 6
  3. 2018Fully Automatic Myocardial Segmentation of Contrast Echocardiography Sequence Using Random Forests Guided by Shape Modelcited by 5
  4. 2019A Fine-Grain Error Map Prediction and Segmentation Quality Assessment Framework for Whole-Heart Segmentationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.