Improving Scheduled Sampling with Elastic Weight Consolidation for Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite strong performance in many sequence-to-sequence tasks, autoregressive models trained with maximum likelihood estimation suffer from exposure bias, i.e. the discrepancy between the ground-truth prefixes used during training and the model-generated prefixes used at inference time. Scheduled sampling is a simple and empirically successful approach which addresses this issue by incorporating model-generated prefixes into training. However, it has been argued that it is an inconsistent training objective leading to models ignoring the prefixes altogether. In this paper, we conduct systematic experiments and find that scheduled sampling, while it ameliorates exposure bias by increasing model reliance on the input sequence, worsens performance when the prefix at inference time is correct, a form of catastrophic forgetting. We propose to use Elastic Weight Consolidation to better balance mitigating exposure bias with retaining performance. Experiments on four IWSLT'14 and WMT'14 translation datasets demonstrate that our approach alleviates catastrophic forgetting and significantly outperforms maximum likelihood estimation and scheduled sampling baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2021.
Builds on
49 of 70 references.
References · 49
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
- 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 779
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
- 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 197
37 more
- 2019Levenshtein Transformercited by 197
- 2015A Neural Conversational Modelcited by 195
- 2020Recall and Learn: Fine-tuning Deep Pretrained Language Models with Less Forgettingcited by 169
- 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 158
- 2020On Exposure Bias, Hallucination and Domain Shift in Neural Machine Translationcited by 127
- 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 126
- 2019Bridging the Gap between Training and Inference for Neural Machine Translationcited by 123
- 2014Reinforcement and Imitation Learning via Interactive No-Regret Learningcited by 116
- 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
- 2020Residual Energy-Based Models for Text Generationcited by 95
- 2017Explaining Recurrent Neural Network Predictions in Sentiment Analysiscited by 87
- 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
- 2019Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic Intelligencecited by 78
- 2015How (not) to Train your Generative Model: Scheduled Sampling, Likelihood, Adversary?cited by 76
- 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
- 2020Autoregressive Knowledge Distillation through Imitation Learningcited by 68
- 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrationscited by 64
- 2019Non-Monotonic Sequential Text Generationcited by 55
- 2017On Quadratic Penalties in Elastic Weight Consolidationcited by 54
- 2015Learning to Search Better Than Your Teachercited by 50
- 2020Conditionally Adaptive Multi-Task Learning: Improving Transfer Learning in NLP Using Fewer Parameters & Less Datacited by 50
- 2019Scheduled Sampling for Transformerscited by 46
- 2019An Embarrassingly Simple Approach for Transfer Learning from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 39
- 2019Imitation Learning for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 36
- 2019Psycholinguistics meets Continual Learning: Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Visual Question Answeringcited by 33
- 2019Evaluating Recurrent Neural Network Explanationscited by 29
- 2017Regularization techniques for fine-tuning in neural machine translationcited by 27
- 2019Forget Me Not: Reducing Catastrophic Forgetting for Domain Adaptation in Reading Comprehensioncited by 27
- 2020EDITOR: an Edit-Based Transformer with Repositioning for Neural Machine Translation with Soft Lexical Constraintscited by 24
- 2018Beyond Error Propagation in Neural Machine Translation: Characteristics of Language Also Mattercited by 18
- 2017SEARNN: Training RNNs with Global-Local Lossescited by 17
- 2017Differentiable Scheduled Sampling for Credit Assignmentcited by 13
- 2019An Empirical Comparison on Imitation Learning and Reinforcement Learning for Paraphrase Generationcited by 11
- 2019Domain Adaptive Inference for Neural Machine Translationcited by 10
- 2021Mixed Cross Entropy Loss for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
- 2019Differentiable Sampling with Flexible Reference Word Order for Neural Machine Translationcited by 5
- 2018Distilling Knowledge for Search-based Structured Predictioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Improving Autoregressive Training with Dynamic Oraclescited by 0
- 2024Improving Autoregressive Training with Dynamic Oracles13 Jun 2024