mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Discovering the Unknown Knowns: Turning Implicit Knowledge in the Dataset into Explicit Training Examples for Visual Question Answering

arXiv 2109.06122 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2021cs.CV cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual question answering (VQA) is challenging not only because the model has to handle multi-modal information, but also because it is just so hard to collect sufficient training examples -- there are too many questions one can ask about an image. As a result, a VQA model trained solely on human-annotated examples could easily over-fit specific question styles or image contents that are being asked, leaving the model largely ignorant about the sheer diversity of questions. Existing methods address this issue primarily by introducing an auxiliary task such as visual grounding, cycle consistency, or debiasing. In this paper, we take a drastically different approach. We found that many of the "unknowns" to the learned VQA model are indeed "known" in the dataset implicitly. For instance, questions asking about the same object in different images are likely paraphrases; the number of detected or annotated objects in an image already provides the answer to the "how many" question, even if the question has not been annotated for that image. Building upon these insights, we present a simple data augmentation pipeline SimpleAug to turn this "known" knowledge into training examples for VQA. We show that these augmented examples can notably improve the learned VQA models' performance, not only on the VQA-CP dataset with language prior shifts but also on the VQA v2 dataset without such shifts. Our method further opens up the door to leverage weakly-labeled or unlabeled images in a principled way to enhance VQA models. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/heendung/simpleAUG.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2021.

Builds on

52 of 69 references.

References · 52

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  6. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  7. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  8. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  9. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  10. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  11. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  12. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
38 more
  1. 2015Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Imagescited by 315
  2. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
  3. 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
  4. 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 183
  5. 2020Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 153
  6. 2017Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoningcited by 130
  7. 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 127
  8. 2016Analyzing the Behavior of Visual Question Answering Modelscited by 119
  9. 2016Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?cited by 111
  10. 2019Towards Causal VQA: Revealing and Reducing Spurious Correlations by Invariant and Covariant Semantic Editingcited by 108
  11. 2019Cycle-Consistency for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 105
  12. 2018Overcoming Language Priors in Visual Question Answering with Adversarial Regularizationcited by 104
  13. 2018Explainable and Explicit Visual Reasoning over Scene Graphscited by 103
  14. 2017Beyond Bilinear: Generalized Multimodal Factorized High-order Pooling for Visual Question Answeringcited by 79
  15. 2020On the Value of Out-of-Distribution Testing: An Example of Goodhart's Lawcited by 74
  16. 2020MUTANT: A Training Paradigm for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Visual Question Answeringcited by 63
  17. 2019Self-Critical Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 61
  18. 2020Removing Bias in Multi-modal Classifiers: Regularization by Maximizing Functional Entropiescited by 56
  19. 2017VQS: Linking Segmentations to Questions and Answers for Supervised Attention in VQA and Question-Focused Semantic Segmentationcited by 50
  20. 2020VQA-LOL: Visual Question Answering under the Lens of Logiccited by 48
  21. 2020Overcoming Language Priors with Self-supervised Learning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 43
  22. 2017Visual Question Generation as Dual Task of Visual Question Answeringcited by 41
  23. 2019Information Maximizing Visual Question Generationcited by 40
  24. 2020A Closer Look at the Robustness of Vision-and-Language Pre-trained Modelscited by 37
  25. 2019Sunny and Dark Outside?! Improving Answer Consistency in VQA through Entailed Question Generationcited by 36
  26. 2021MosaicOS: A Simple and Effective Use of Object-Centric Images for Long-Tailed Object Detectioncited by 33
  27. 2020Semantic Equivalent Adversarial Data Augmentation for Visual Question Answeringcited by 26
  28. 2019Adversarial Regularization for Visual Question Answering: Strengths, Shortcomings, and Side Effectscited by 25
  29. 2019An Empirical Study on Leveraging Scene Graphs for Visual Question Answeringcited by 21
  30. 2020Visual Grounding Methods for VQA are Working for the Wrong Reasons!cited by 18
  31. 2018Cross-Dataset Adaptation for Visual Question Answeringcited by 17
  32. 2018Differential Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 12
  33. 2017Being Negative but Constructively: Lessons Learnt from Creating Better Visual Question Answering Datasetscited by 11
  34. 2018Learning Answer Embeddings for Visual Question Answeringcited by 11
  35. 2019Generating Question Relevant Captions to Aid Visual Question Answeringcited by 10
  36. 2019Actively Seeking and Learning from Live Datacited by 9
  37. 2020Learning from Lexical Perturbations for Consistent Visual Question Answeringcited by 7
  38. 2019Improving Visual Question Answering by Referring to Generated Paragraph Captionscited by 6

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: