Correcting the User Feedback-Loop Bias for Recommendation Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Selection bias is prevalent in the data for training and evaluating recommendation systems with explicit feedback. For example, users tend to rate items they like. However, when rating an item concerning a specific user, most of the recommendation algorithms tend to rely too much on his/her rating (feedback) history. This introduces implicit bias on the recommendation system, which is referred to as user feedback-loop bias in this paper. We propose a systematic and dynamic way to correct such bias and to obtain more diverse and objective recommendations by utilizing temporal rating information. Specifically, our method includes a deep-learning component to learn each user's dynamic rating history embedding for the estimation of the probability distribution of the items that the user rates sequentially. These estimated dynamic exposure probabilities are then used as propensity scores to train an inverse-propensity-scoring (IPS) rating predictor. We empirically validated the existence of such user feedback-loop bias in real world recommendation systems and compared the performance of our method with the baseline models that are either without de-biasing or with propensity scores estimated by other methods. The results show the superiority of our approach.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2021.
Builds on
10 of 26 references.
References · 10
- 2018Personalized Top-N Sequential Recommendation via Convolutional Sequence Embeddingcited by 473
- 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
- 2018A Simple Convolutional Generative Network for Next Item Recommendationcited by 120
- 2017How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utilitycited by 116
- 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
- 2015Modeling User Exposure in Recommendationcited by 69
- 2018Sequential Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 31
- 2015Estimating the Causal Impact of Recommendation Systems from Observational Datacited by 21
- 2017Human Interaction with Recommendation Systemscited by 15
- 2017Collaborative Filtering with Social Exposure: A Modular Approach to Social Recommendationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
- 2022Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inferencecited by 14
- 2023Tackling Interference Induced by Data Training Loops in A/B Tests: A Weighted Training Approachcited by 3
- 2023Counterfactual Augmentation for Multimodal Learning Under Presentation Biascited by 1
- 2025Counterfactual Reciprocal Recommender Systems for User-to-User Matchingcited by 0
- 2025Counterfactual Reciprocal Recommender Systems for User-to-User Matching3 Aug 2025
- 2023Tackling Interference Induced by Data Training Loops in A/B Tests: A Weighted Training Approach26 Oct 2023
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment10 Aug 2023
- 2023Counterfactual Augmentation for Multimodal Learning Under Presentation Bias23 May 2023
- 2022Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference4 Jul 2022