Efficient Multiple Constraint Acquisition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Constraint acquisition systems such as QuAcq and MultiAcq can assist non-expert users to model their problems as constraint networks by classifying (partial) examples as positive or negative. For each negative example, the former focuses on one constraint of the target network, while the latter can learn a maximum number of constraints. Two bottlenecks of the acquisition process where both these algorithms encounter problems are the large number of queries required to reach convergence, and the high cpu times needed to generate queries, especially near convergence. In this paper we propose algorithmic and heuristic methods to deal with both these issues. We first describe an algorithm, called MQuAcq, that blends the main idea of MultiAcq into QuAcq resulting in a method that learns as many constraints as MultiAcq does after a negative example, but with a lower complexity. A detailed theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithm is also presented. %We also present a technique that boosts the performance of constraint acquisition by reducing the number of queries significantly. Then we turn our attention to query generation which is a significant but rather overlooked part of the acquisition process. We describe %in detail how query generation in a typical constraint acquisition system operates, and we propose heuristics for improving its efficiency. Experiments from various domains demonstrate that our resulting algorithm that integrates all the new techniques does not only generate considerably fewer queries than QuAcq and MultiAcq, but it is also by far faster than both of them, in average query generation time as well as in total run time, and also largely alleviates the premature convergence problem.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2021.
Builds on
2 of 42 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Guided Bottom-Up Interactive Constraint Acquisitioncited by 3
- 2023Learning to Learn in Interactive Constraint Acquisitioncited by 2
- 2022Easy, adaptable and high-quality Modelling with domain-specific Constraint Patternscited by 1
- 2024Deep Neural Network for Constraint Acquisition through Tailored Loss Functioncited by 0
- 2026Constraint acquisition needs better benchmarkscited by 0
- 2026Learning Symbolic Constraint Representations from Examples: A Neuro-Symbolic Approachcited by 0
- 2026Learning Symbolic Constraint Representations from Examples: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach10 Sep 2026
- 2026Constraint acquisition needs better benchmarks25 May 2026
- 2024Deep Neural Network for Constraint Acquisition through Tailored Loss Function4 Mar 2024
- 2023Learning to Learn in Interactive Constraint Acquisition17 Dec 2023
- 2023Guided Bottom-Up Interactive Constraint Acquisition12 Jul 2023
- 2022Easy, adaptable and high-quality Modelling with domain-specific Constraint Patterns6 Jun 2022