mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Clinical Characteristics for Improved Deep Learning-Based Kidney Tumor Segmentation on CT

arXiv 2109.05816 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2021cs.CV eess.IVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper assesses whether using clinical characteristics in addition to imaging can improve automated segmentation of kidney cancer on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). A total of 300 kidney cancer patients with contrast-enhanced CT scans and clinical characteristics were included. A baseline segmentation of the kidney cancer was performed using a 3D U-Net. Input to the U-Net were the contrast-enhanced CT images, output were segmentations of kidney, kidney tumors, and kidney cysts. A cognizant sampling strategy was used to leverage clinical characteristics for improved segmentation. To this end, a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was used. Segmentations were evaluated using Dice and Surface Dice. Improvement in segmentation was assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The baseline 3D U-Net showed a segmentation performance of 0.90 for kidney and kidney masses, i.e., kidney, tumor, and cyst, 0.29 for kidney masses, and 0.28 for kidney tumor, while the 3D U-Net trained with cognizant sampling enhanced the segmentation performance and reached Dice scores of 0.90, 0.39, and 0.38 respectively. To conclude, the cognizant sampling strategy leveraging the clinical characteristics significantly improved kidney cancer segmentation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2021.

Builds on

2 of 15 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019The state of the art in kidney and kidney tumor segmentation in contrast-enhanced CT imaging: Results of the KiTS19 Challengecited by 188
  2. 2018Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapycited by 76

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.