Feature Importance in Gradient Boosting Trees with Cross-Validation Feature Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) are among the go-to algorithms on tabular data, which produce state of the art results in many prediction tasks. Despite its popularity, the GBM framework suffers from a fundamental flaw in its base learners. Specifically, most implementations utilize decision trees that are typically biased towards categorical variables with large cardinalities. The effect of this bias was extensively studied over the years, mostly in terms of predictive performance. In this work, we extend the scope and study the effect of biased base learners on GBM feature importance (FI) measures. We show that although these implementation demonstrate highly competitive predictive performance, they still, surprisingly, suffer from bias in FI. By utilizing cross-validated (CV) unbiased base learners, we fix this flaw at a relatively low computational cost. We demonstrate the suggested framework in a variety of synthetic and real-world setups, showing a significant improvement in all GBM FI measures while maintaining relatively the same level of prediction accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2021.
Builds on
8 of 41 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
- 2013Correlation and variable importance in random forestscited by 41
- 2015Cross-Validated Variable Selection in Tree-Based Methods Improves Predictive Performancecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Generative AI voting: fair collective choice is resilient to LLM biases and inconsistenciescited by 6
- 2022Individualized and Global Feature Attributions for Gradient Boosted Trees in the Presence of ℓ2 Regularizationcited by 2
- 2023Deep incremental learning models for financial temporal tabular datasets with distribution shiftscited by 1
- 2022Sequential Permutation Testing of Random Forest Variable Importance Measurescited by 0
- 2025Integrating Feature Selection and Machine Learning for Nitrogen Assessment in Grapevine Leaves using In-Field Hyperspectral Imagingcited by 0
- 2026CAFE-GB: Scalable and Stable Feature Selection for Malware Detection via Chunk-wise Aggregated Gradient Boostingcited by 0
- 2026CAFE-GB: Scalable and Stable Feature Selection for Malware Detection via Chunk-wise Aggregated Gradient Boosting22 Jan 2026
- 2025Integrating Feature Selection and Machine Learning for Nitrogen Assessment in Grapevine Leaves using In-Field Hyperspectral Imaging23 Jul 2025
- 2024Generative AI voting: fair collective choice is resilient to LLM biases and inconsistencies31 May 2024
- 2023Deep incremental learning models for financial temporal tabular datasets with distribution shifts14 Mar 2023
- 2022Individualized and Global Feature Attributions for Gradient Boosted Trees in the Presence of ℓ2 Regularization8 Nov 2022
- 2022Sequential Permutation Testing of Random Forest Variable Importance Measures2 Jun 2022