mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Making Table Understanding Work in Practice

arXiv 2109.05173 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2021cs.DB cs.HC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the semantics of tables at scale is crucial for tasks like data integration, preparation, and search. Table understanding methods aim at detecting a table's topic, semantic column types, column relations, or entities. With the rise of deep learning, powerful models have been developed for these tasks with excellent accuracy on benchmarks. However, we observe that there exists a gap between the performance of these models on these benchmarks and their applicability in practice. In this paper, we address the question: what do we need for these models to work in practice? We discuss three challenges of deploying table understanding models and propose a framework to address them. These challenges include 1) difficulty in customizing models to specific domains, 2) lack of training data for typical database tables often found in enterprises, and 3) lack of confidence in the inferences made by models. We present SigmaTyper which implements this framework for the semantic column type detection task. SigmaTyper encapsulates a hybrid model trained on GitTables and integrates a lightweight human-in-the-loop approach to customize the model. Lastly, we highlight avenues for future research that further close the gap towards making table understanding effective in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2021.

Builds on

25 of 47 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
  5. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  6. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
  7. 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 331
  8. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  9. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
  10. 2018Reducing Network Agnostophobiacited by 165
  11. 2018An introduction to domain adaptation and transfer learningcited by 112
  12. 2021TABBIE: Pretrained Representations of Tabular Datacited by 111
13 more
  1. 2020TUTA: Tree-based Transformers for Generally Structured Table Pre-trainingcited by 100
  2. 2021Open Domain Question Answering over Tables via Dense Retrievalcited by 74
  3. 2019Sherlock: A Deep Learning Approach to Semantic Data Type Detectioncited by 73
  4. 2018Data2Vis: Automatic Generation of Data Visualizations Using Sequence to Sequence Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 47
  5. 2021GitTables: A Large-Scale Corpus of Relational Tablescited by 44
  6. 2018VizML: A Machine Learning Approach to Visualization Recommendationcited by 38
  7. 2020RPT: Relational Pre-trained Transformer Is Almost All You Need towards Democratizing Data Preparationcited by 27
  8. 2021TCN: Table Convolutional Network for Web Table Interpretationcited by 24
  9. 2020TURL: Table Understanding through Representation Learningcited by 14
  10. 2019Multi-modal Synthesis of Regular Expressionscited by 13
  11. 2018FigureNet: A Deep Learning model for Question-Answering on Scientific Plotscited by 6
  12. 2020Leveraging Organizational Resources to Adapt Models to New Data Modalitiescited by 6
  13. 2020Data Programming by Demonstration: A Framework for Interactively Learning Labeling Functionscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.